Both of their contracts already count against the cap.
So what you are saying is that is DEFINITELY not the reason.
What about potential trade with Ravens that is being rumored about?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Both of their contracts already count against the cap.
So what you are saying is that is DEFINITELY not the reason.
What about potential trade with Ravens that is being rumored about?
The weirdest part of all --- AD doesn't play, TBC gets cut ---
AND BURGESS KEEPS GETTING SNAPS !!!
I have to say, it's more than intriguing. I love it.
Does this mean the 4-3 is back full time?
So what you are saying is that is DEFINITELY not the reason.
What about potential trade with Ravens that is being rumored about?
That doesn't help this make sense, though...
Either we make a blockbuster trade by tomorrow or meet your new every down pass rusher named Nincovich
did they already have the roster space to activate Tate/Levoir?
I believe the rumored trade is Galloway for a draft pick. That would put the roster down by 2.
So, he's a free agent, basically, assuming the cut happened before the trading deadline?
Burgess was there on a couple of plays. It's possible that a move to the 3-4 might be exactly what he needs. Me? I'm as perplexed by this move as anyone else. He was doing really good for us so far this season... especially in the pass rush.
When is the trade deadline -- what time of day?
Terdell Sands coming back?
Burgess was there on a couple of plays. It's possible that a move to the 3-4 might be exactly what he needs. Me? I'm as perplexed by this move as anyone else. He was doing really good for us so far this season... especially in the pass rush.
BTW did Terdell play yesterday?
Just trying to get my head around this like everyone else. Is it possible that TBC is being released to open up a roster spot to bring in a Rb, being that Sammy Morris got injured yesterday and is not going to be out for the season they don't want to IR him. You don't just release someone without having someone in mind to take their roster spot.
No, but losing a 3- sack player for either seems a bizzaro trade-off.
the only thing i can think of is that they must see Burgess and TBC as redundant parts in an increasingly 3-4 defense - they're both sub-package rush players, and maybe they think Burgess has more potential in that role? They already pretty much knew what they were getting with TBC, and maybe Burgess is finally comfortable with the defense?
Still got Faulk, Maroney and the Law Firm
Why release a 3 sack guy in an area we're totally under performing in to cover RB?