- Joined
- Dec 21, 2007
- Messages
- 22,794
- Reaction score
- 15,581
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Why sign Demps if you're just going to IR the kid? This whole "stashing" would maybe make a bit of sense if anyone here could point to a single example where it's ever worked (a player went on to succeed after being IRed before his rookie regular season).
The last thing Demps needs is more time away from organized football. If we end up keeping someone like Rivera at his expense, that's just going to be dumb.
if what you say is true, then why even open your big mouth to tell me what and what not to post?
more of your scumbag ageist bigotry???...feel free to F O & D...
if what you say is true, then why even open your big mouth to tell me what and what not to post?
more of your scumbag ageist bigotry???...feel free to F O & D...
Probably the same reason they claimed Ballard just to IR him.
Of course you openly lie...and I have NEVER taken an unsolicited swipe at you..it has ALWAYS been you ,with your bigoted views about older posters, that has posted vicious hate filled posts directly aimed at me. I HAVE the post you wrote in the "Ref" archived..it is CLASSIC ageism...you are ignorant of YOUR own failings...feel free to use the ignore function if that will stop your unwarranted flaming of my posts.
BTW..you may have edited your post but I archived it as it stood a few minutes ago...pretty insane huh, bigot??
Yes, I stand by my characterization of you as insane. Posts like this really aren't helping your case.
Brady FTW-To be clear, at no point in this post did you make anything resembling a rational point. It was a bunch of rambling incoherence by a sexist old man with nothing worthwhile to contribute to this discussion. Then again, this entire thread could pretty much be summed up as that. I'd suggest that you should be ashamed of yourself, but it's pretty clear that you lack the intellect or perspective necessary to understand why that's the case.
By general definition...ageism
The term was coined in 1969 by Robert Neil Butler to describe discrimination against seniors, and patterned on sexism and racism. Butler defined ageism as a combination of three connected elements. Among them were prejudicial attitudes towards older people, old age, and the aging process; discriminatory practices against older people; and institutional practices and policies that perpetuate stereotypes about older people
You are a classic ageist bigot...period. Feel free to "intelligently" navigate your way to your user profile and put me on ignore. That will spare you my senile ramblings and, as a result, spare me the unsolicited insults and assaults of some Orange County wingnut.
THAT I can understand, Vuudu....
Not sure of the back and forth going on, but Joker, since I joined this forum, not once I have understood a single post of yours.
Not my fight, don't know any insults hurled before my post, but if it is about someone not understanding Joker's post, then I am with that person.
.......I would guess it's futile,then,to explain "schtick" or Lenny Bruce to you:wha: