- Joined
- Jun 12, 2006
- Messages
- 5,391
- Reaction score
- 606
It looks like we will have a more balanced offense than last year. I think we will have to score points to help the defense which does not appear to be as strong as years past. I am interested in opinions on an ideal breakdown of run versus pass and who will be catching the ball.
Using 2004, the Patriots best offensive year, as a barometer I came up with the following projection for 2006. Being conservative, even without Branch, this should be a very good offense. With Branch add 400 more passing yards add 1 PPG, his presence will decrease the number of touches for other players.
2006 - Projections
26.5 PPG
Spilt - 470/ 475 = .99 ratio pass to run
Passing
300/470, 63.8% - 3700 yards
Caldwell 30, Brown 30, Gabriel 40. Jackson 20, Branch ???, Childress 10, Smith 5, Watson 40, Graham 25, Mills 5, Thomas 15, Faulk 35, Dillion 15, Maroney 20, Others 10
Rushing
475\1900 yards, 4 ypc
180 -Maroney - 750 yards, 200- Dillion - 750 yards (hopefully a lot of clock killing), 70 Faulk - 300 yards, 30 various - 100 yards
----------------------------- Historical Stats - Offense ---------------------------------
2005 - 23.7 PPG
Spilt - 530/ 434 = 1.22 ratio pass to run
- Passing - 334/530 = 63%, 4322 yards
- Rushing - 434/1513, 3.5 YPC (Dillion 733, Faulk 245)
2004 - 27.3 PPG
Spilt - 474/ 524 = .90 ratio pass to run
- Passing - 288/474 =60.8%, 3750 yards
- Rushing - 524/2134, 4.1 (Dillion 1635, Faulk 235)
2003 -21.75 PPG
Spilt - 527/ 466 = 1.13 ratio pass to run
- Passing - 317/527 = 60.2%, 3561 yards
- Rushing - 466/1617, 3.5 YPC (Antowain Smith 642, Faulk 638)
2002 - 23.8 PPG
Spilt - 601/ 473 = 1.27 ratio pass to run
- Passing - 373/601 =62.1%, 3767 yards
- Rushing - 473/1793, 3.8 YPC (Antowain Smith 1157, Faulk 169)
2001 - 23.2 PPG
Spilt - 413/ 395 = 1.05 ratio pass to run
- Passing - 264/413 =63.9%, 3053 yards
- Rushing - 395/1508, 3.8 YPC (Antowain Smith 982, Faulk 271)
Using 2004, the Patriots best offensive year, as a barometer I came up with the following projection for 2006. Being conservative, even without Branch, this should be a very good offense. With Branch add 400 more passing yards add 1 PPG, his presence will decrease the number of touches for other players.
2006 - Projections
26.5 PPG
Spilt - 470/ 475 = .99 ratio pass to run
Passing
300/470, 63.8% - 3700 yards
Caldwell 30, Brown 30, Gabriel 40. Jackson 20, Branch ???, Childress 10, Smith 5, Watson 40, Graham 25, Mills 5, Thomas 15, Faulk 35, Dillion 15, Maroney 20, Others 10
Rushing
475\1900 yards, 4 ypc
180 -Maroney - 750 yards, 200- Dillion - 750 yards (hopefully a lot of clock killing), 70 Faulk - 300 yards, 30 various - 100 yards
----------------------------- Historical Stats - Offense ---------------------------------
2005 - 23.7 PPG
Spilt - 530/ 434 = 1.22 ratio pass to run
- Passing - 334/530 = 63%, 4322 yards
- Rushing - 434/1513, 3.5 YPC (Dillion 733, Faulk 245)
2004 - 27.3 PPG
Spilt - 474/ 524 = .90 ratio pass to run
- Passing - 288/474 =60.8%, 3750 yards
- Rushing - 524/2134, 4.1 (Dillion 1635, Faulk 235)
2003 -21.75 PPG
Spilt - 527/ 466 = 1.13 ratio pass to run
- Passing - 317/527 = 60.2%, 3561 yards
- Rushing - 466/1617, 3.5 YPC (Antowain Smith 642, Faulk 638)
2002 - 23.8 PPG
Spilt - 601/ 473 = 1.27 ratio pass to run
- Passing - 373/601 =62.1%, 3767 yards
- Rushing - 473/1793, 3.8 YPC (Antowain Smith 1157, Faulk 169)
2001 - 23.2 PPG
Spilt - 413/ 395 = 1.05 ratio pass to run
- Passing - 264/413 =63.9%, 3053 yards
- Rushing - 395/1508, 3.8 YPC (Antowain Smith 982, Faulk 271)