pwes
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2007
- Messages
- 6,019
- Reaction score
- 2,052
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Having two all-world TE's, plus two backups who happen to get hurt, forcing you to sign a player that you worked out a few weeks ago (aka, planned for), is suddenly poor planning?
Changing your offense to combat it's inability to overcome the situation where taking away one player via double team renders it dysfunctional by switching to another scheme that is rendered even more dysfunctional if one player is taken away is certainly something that might fall into the realm of poor planning.
This team had the personnel and capacity to alternatively be almost anything other than a pure two TE drive offense at it's disposal coming out of camp and instead chose to focus almost exclusively on efforts not to be. Seven TE's and counting, most of whom can't get on or stay on the field apparently. Welker benched at $9.5M lest he derail that agenda driven vision. Mindmumbing. Who needs a functional WR corps or OL when you have 7 TE's on the roster...
Changing your offense to combat it's inability to overcome the situation where taking away one player via double team renders it dysfunctional by switching to another scheme that is rendered even more dysfunctional if one player is taken away is certainly something that might fall into the realm of poor planning.
This team had the personnel and capacity to alternatively be almost anything other than a pure two TE drive offense at it's disposal coming out of camp and instead chose to focus almost exclusively on efforts not to be. Seven TE's and counting, most of whom can't get on or stay on the field apparently. Welker benched at $9.5M lest he derail that agenda driven vision. Mindmumbing. Who needs a functional WR corps or OL when you have 7 TE's on the roster...
They worked him out in earlier this month. You think they'd know if his knees were ok or not.
Good points Mo. I have to admit that I'm a little confused by the moves that they have made on offense. Has there ever been 7 tightends on this team? I guess all we can do is wait and see.
Schefter disagrees. He reported he passed his physical.
They worked him out in earlier this month. You think they'd know if his knees were ok or not.
Changing your offense to combat it's inability to overcome the situation where taking away one player via double team renders it dysfunctional by switching to another scheme that is rendered even more dysfunctional if one player is taken away is certainly something that might fall into the realm of poor planning.
This team had the personnel and capacity to alternatively be almost anything other than a pure two TE drive offense at it's disposal coming out of camp and instead chose to focus almost exclusively on efforts not to be. Seven TE's and counting, most of whom can't get on or stay on the field apparently. Welker benched at $9.5M lest he derail that agenda driven vision. Mindmumbing. Who needs a functional WR corps or OL when you have 7 TE's on the roster...
Plus, didn't they have him in about 2-3 weeks ago already?
This isn't a knee-jerk desperation move at all. They did their homework on the guy BEFORE Hernandez was injured.
For those saying Winslow's knees are "shot", he caught only 4 less passes than Hernandez last year (75) from Josh Freakin' Freeman.
I don't like the dude, but I think it's a probably well-thought out maneuver.
Even with the Hernandez injury this doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
Really poor planning to have to resort to a free agent like Winslow in the event that Hernandez got injured, especially since Hernandez has been fairly injury prone in the years prior, losing Hernandez is a huge part of the offense, but the fact that it appears this team is unable to function without another tight end is disturbing.
.
While we're at it. Can we sign Andre Carter? I think he'd be lethal opposite Chandler Jones and use him as a situational pass rusher.
Is it that hard to truly understand? They wanted to carry four TEs on the 53 man roster the whole time. They acknowledged they needed viable backups for Hernandez and Gronkowski. Shiancoe should have been the guy next in line after Hernandez but he's hurt and not ready to be activated off of designated IR.
The Patriots abandoned three WR sets a long time ago and it's pointless carrying more WRs than you need. The likelihood is Branch remains in town in case of injury to our WR corps.
What Mo is saying is he thinks we should completely abandon our offensive philosophy in this situation, then go right back to it in 4-6 weeks. That's stupid.
Winslow may not be a 16 game starter any more, but he's a decent enough stop gap in order for us to continue running our system and, if defences don't respect his threat, he will have success.
Great move.