Who here believes this?
The league set themselves up for this when they ignored Johnson's blatant public tampering.
I also believe that addressing this will wratchet up the sanctions for tampering with players who are actually under contract.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Who here believes this?
The league set themselves up for this when they ignored Johnson's blatant public tampering.
I think since McCourty signed with the Pats and it was Jacksonville with highest bid and Philly coming in second that the league will do nothing about Johnson's blantant tampering.
I don't think that's right but it is what I think will happen.
What does McCourty have to do with the Jets tampering with Revis?
Koma said: ↑
Notice how the "The League is Unhappy" story only came out after the Patriots re-signed a player. Coincidence?
Technically the Pats resigned one of their own players, so its not even tampering legal or otherwise. If the Pats had reached an agreement with a player from another team, then Tampergate would have been born!
Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter 18s18 seconds ago
NFL sent memos to specific teams today, telling them to hold on to phone records; investigating agreements announced in three-day window.
Only the gullible would fall for that...oh wait, that's most of the media.What if the team execs have "private" email servers unknown to the NFL?
Or they pull the "My hard disk crashed and all the backups have been lost!"
We know these BS tactics work.