Welcome to PatsFans.com

OT: Raiders trying to get $10 million back from Russell

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by jmt57, May 28, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jmt57

    jmt57 Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2005
    Messages:
    13,430
    Likes Received:
    173
    Ratings:
    +554 / 0 / -3

    http://www.mercurynews.com/peninsula/ci_15179908?nclick_check=1

    First Al Davis does not pay Mike Shanahan the money he was due when he fired him, then he tries the same thing with Lane Kiffin - now he's trying to pull the same thing on a player he cut.

    I seem to recall Davis saying a while back that the Raiders had to overpay free agents in order to get them to come to Oakland. I'd say this habit of suing people that you fired for money you already paid them is not going to make it any easier to attract employees. I would say any player or coach considering going to work there hire not just an agent, but an additional contract lawyer to double check all the terms and conditions with a fine tooth comb.

    EDIT: Here's the original article from Yahoo.
    Raiders file grievance against Russell - NFL - Yahoo! Sports

     
  2. robertweathers

    robertweathers Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Messages:
    7,769
    Likes Received:
    16
    Ratings:
    +51 / 1 / -0

    Re: Raiders trying to get $10 million back from Russell

    Who knows with these things but if the Raiders altered the contract by converting future salary into additional bonus by cutting JR a check to lessen the cap hit or improve future cash flow in '10, '11 and '12, then the Raiders don't have a leg to stand on. They assumed the business risk and tuff toodles for them.
     
  3. PatsFanSince74

    PatsFanSince74 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Messages:
    10,030
    Likes Received:
    68
    Ratings:
    +174 / 3 / -1

    Re: Raiders trying to get $10 million back from Russell

    I think Jamarcus invested it...in Big Macs and Fries...supersized...
     
  4. lillestroom

    lillestroom Practice Squad Player

    Joined:
    May 23, 2010
    Messages:
    243
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Re: Raiders trying to get $10 million back from Russell

    Dang... You beat me to the punch.
     
  5. Spiral

    Spiral PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Messages:
    1,037
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +35 / 4 / -1

    Re: Raiders trying to get $10 million back from Russell

    Note that he didn't file a lawsuit. He filed a grievance with the NFL. Last time I checked, Russell was not an NFL player, nor is he likely to be one in the future. What can the NFL do? Davis probably would have been better off filing his grievance with Jimmy Hoffa rather than with Roger Goodell.
     
  6. KontradictioN

    KontradictioN Do you even lift? PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    27,665
    Likes Received:
    695
    Ratings:
    +2,100 / 32 / -51

    No Jersey Selected

    Re: Raiders trying to get $10 million back from Russell

    If you were dumb enough to draft the guy with the first pick in the draft, then pay him what you owe him.
     
  7. cavtroop

    cavtroop 2nd Team Getting Their First Start

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Messages:
    1,922
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    #87 Jersey

    Re: Raiders trying to get $10 million back from Russell

    QFT

    Why anyone would play for this organization after all the crap they've pulled in the last few years is beyond me. Money is funny like that, I guess.
     
  8. Ian

    Ian Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2000
    Messages:
    5,278
    Likes Received:
    251
    Ratings:
    +351 / 2 / -1

    #17 Jersey

    This could be one of the most ridiculous things I've seen in a while :rolleyes:

    I don't see how a player could possibly be asked to pay back money that he was compensated with in good faith from his employer - regardless of any clause in the contract (which I could be wrong, but I would think there is absolutely no way I could see his agent agreeing to). Russell did nothing wrong (other than play like crap) and was simply cut (ie: fired) - so I can't see this one going anywhere.
     
    Last edited: May 28, 2010
  9. spacecrime

    spacecrime Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    17
    Ratings:
    +17 / 0 / -0

    Players are always demanding that contracts be modified when they "exceed" the contract. I think it would be hypocritical of them of them to not acknowledge the merits of this grievance and support Al Davis. Plus, players should stand behind this grievance to set the precedent of modifying contracts based on performance, so that more guys can do like Branch did and Crayton is trying to do: get their contracts modified.

    Not that I agree with it. I think the Raiders ought to pay up, but I also think the NFl should not have allowed Branch to play for another team after refusing to honor his contract.

    I think whatever happens, it needs to go both ways. Either leave Russell and his money alone and not allow players to shoot their way out of town, or let players hold out but allow teams to recap bonus money for pro-rated years.

    Fair is fair.
     
  10. apple strudel

    apple strudel Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,894
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    Sure, if you're playing a different game than the one players and teams are playing.
     
  11. PatsWickedPissah

    PatsWickedPissah PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Messages:
    23,778
    Likes Received:
    684
    Ratings:
    +1,863 / 19 / -12

    Disable Jersey

    Heh. 10 char
     
  12. PatsChamp88

    PatsChamp88 In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2009
    Messages:
    2,216
    Likes Received:
    18
    Ratings:
    +68 / 3 / -0

    #75 Jersey

    Good luck! They did it to themselves
     
  13. PatsFanStnfrd

    PatsFanStnfrd Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2009
    Messages:
    540
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Actually this is one time it is hard NOT to sympathize with Al Davis. JeMarcus Russell owed a duty to show up fit and ready to play.
     
  14. apple strudel

    apple strudel Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2008
    Messages:
    5,894
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    Not picking a fight, but Al owed his organization and his fans some due diligence on the guy he invested tens of millions of dollars in (he also owes them some good coaches, some good schemes, and a whole bunch of other halfway competent stuff, too).
     
  15. MoLewisrocks

    MoLewisrocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    19,949
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +29 / 0 / -0

    Bingo. Accountability starts at the top. Al has never taken responsibility for any of his myriad of screw ups in the last several years, preferring instead to shift blame and responsibility onto the purported screw up for merely existing... So why should his players. He notoriously overpays/overdrafts for measurables as well as marginal on field talent and underpays for and undervalues coaching because he lets his ego run the franchise.

    This is just classic Al. He wants the credit when they win and someone else blamed when they suck...This time he wants his frustrated beyond belief fan base to rally behind him and aim their pitchforks in Russell's direction. And the half of them who didn't come to terms with the fact that nothing's going to change in Oakland until Al meets his maker will.
     
  16. eom

    eom In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Messages:
    2,601
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +32 / 0 / -2

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>