Welcome to PatsFans.com

OT: David Givens sues Titans

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by pats1, Sep 23, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. pats1

    pats1 Moderator PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    13,261
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

  2. reflexblue

    reflexblue PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Messages:
    17,226
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +12 / 0 / -0

    First it sounds like more than just a football related injury, it sounds like it could be congenital, and playing football worsened it.


    "Its not about the money" of course how could anyone be so silly to think it was. :rolleyes:

    "David is not the happy guy i used to know" well he can get a knee replacement.
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2009
  3. ctpatsfan77

    ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,246
    Likes Received:
    33
    Ratings:
    +34 / 0 / -1

    Obviously, I'm not a professional football player, so I can only imagine just how much football truly means to Givens. So to suddenly have that taken away from you, perhaps through no real fault of your own, could be truly devastating.
  4. reflexblue

    reflexblue PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Messages:
    17,226
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +12 / 0 / -0

    I'm sure it is to Givens, its his agent that i quoted. Years ago i hurt my thumb were i was working i couldn't use my right hand for a while, it was a congenital defect in the baselor joint. I like being able to use my hand like givens likes playing football. But it wasn't the companies fault that it happened, it was pre-existing. My job at the time hastened the onset of the problem.

    "it was ultimately determined that the previously-known lesion and defect in his knee had crumbled."

    If this is the case his knee would have crumbled eventually, football just speed up the process.

    I think Givens does have a case because he was NO LONGER Able to play.

    My problem is more with Givens agent and the dramatics.
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2009
  5. Gwedd

    Gwedd PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    4,898
    Likes Received:
    16
    Ratings:
    +21 / 0 / -0

    No Jersey Selected

    If the Titans failed to inform Givens about the injury or defect, then yes, he has a very strong case against them, the statute of limitations notwithstanding.
  6. ctpatsfan77

    ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,246
    Likes Received:
    33
    Ratings:
    +34 / 0 / -1

    IANAL, but I think that in a case where one party has deceived another, the clock starts when that deception is discovered, not from the date of the original exam.
  7. MoLewisrocks

    MoLewisrocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    19,949
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +29 / 0 / -0

    Sounds like these findings were part of his pre contract physical. Might explain why there were never any other serious takers in his UFA season (his hometown Houston team lowballed him). It appeared at the time that Tennessee overpaid for a guy who wasn't generating the expected level of interest on the FA market. Many people have since pointed to the loss of Givens in 2005 and Branch in 2006 because the team wouldn't simply pay them as one of the reasons we failed to threepeat or fourpeat as expected... Thing is teams usually know more about players and situations than fans do. Few players come in to the league let alone remain there without both players and organizations balancing concerns, often times revolving around potential durability issues. Neither Givens nor Branch has played a full season or a meaningful role for an NFL team since the day they left.

    I feel bad for David. He always seemed like a good kid and we didn't really make any effort to retain him. At the time many assumed it was just because with Branch already chomping at the bit for a new deal we couldn't or wouldn't because of how that would have raised the bar - and we were cheaping out. Perhaps all along our remarkably fallable HC was simply playing out the string with two guys he believed would never provide value with big second deals because despite some talent they had substantial potential medical/durability issues looming.
  8. spacecrime

    spacecrime Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    17
    Ratings:
    +17 / 0 / -0

    Givens said had he known about the defect, he would have had it repaired before playing football. Whatever the results might have been, the Titans were wrong in withholding this information. Perhaps had Givens had the operation, the knee would not have been adequate for football, but by not telling him, the Titans let him continue on a course pretty much guaranteed to destroy his knee.

    He should have been told beforehand. It is possible that the Titans will be not LEGALLY responsible, but I cannot see how their actions are acceptible in any way from a human or moral standpoint.
  9. spacecrime

    spacecrime Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    17
    Ratings:
    +17 / 0 / -0

    This isn't right. We made Givens a huge offer, but the Titans offered more. If the archives are available, go check. Givens took the larger offer because he'd been playing for 7th round money and wanted a payday. But we offered decent, competitive money, over $20 mil IIRC.
  10. ctpatsfan77

    ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,246
    Likes Received:
    33
    Ratings:
    +34 / 0 / -1

    :agree: :agree:

    POTD.
  11. patsfan-1982

    patsfan-1982 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2007
    Messages:
    4,016
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    the pats only offerd him like 16 million over 5 years

    the texans offerd him 17.5 million over 5 years

    the titans offerd him 24 million over 5 years

    he made the right move he got hurt that year and may never play football again so he needs all the money he can get

    and it worked out good for the pats to if they resign givens

    maybe he dose not get hurt

    but they dont trade for welker and moss
  12. Garbanza

    Garbanza Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2004
    Messages:
    2,203
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Um.....I'm think Givens is a good guy and all, but OF COURSE IT'S ABOUT THEY MONEY!

    He leaves NE for a big payday - and good for him - but it was about the money!

    He's suing the Titans for negligence - and good for him - but it's about the money!

    I do have my question about the lawsuit though....why would the Titans pay him all that money if they knew his knee was shot?
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2009
  13. tedylb

    tedylb Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2005
    Messages:
    569
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

  14. Bring Back Antowain!

    Bring Back Antowain! Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

  15. Bring Back Antowain!

    Bring Back Antowain! Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Re: David Givens sues Titans-25 Mil

    Duplicate thread mods
  16. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    16,254
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +11 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    That's the only thing that doesn't add up for me. It doesn't make sense for the Titans, having just signed this guy as a FA to a lucrative contract, to then go out and have him play on an injury that they knew would end his career. He's an investment to the team, and teams protect their investments. If he was an UDFA, or near the end of his contract, I wouldn't be surprised at all, but strictly from an investment standpoint, this account makes no sense from the Titans' end.

    That said, I'm with spacecrime: if they Titans did actually withhold this info from Givens, then that's despicable, and they're responsible for not giving him the opportunity to get this problem fixed before it ended his career (although I'm always surprised if/when athletes don't see their own doctors for outside opinions on a regular basis).
  17. MoLewisrocks

    MoLewisrocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    19,949
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +29 / 0 / -0

    No, we didn't. In fact the Texans offered him a million more than we did and he was crashingly disappointed. We didn't even make him an offer until FA opened, and ours was loaded with unmakeable incentives...even if his knee didn't blow.

    Wrong wrote a lengthy piece on the negotiations.




    Inside the Givens talks - The Boston Globe
  18. MoLewisrocks

    MoLewisrocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    19,949
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +29 / 0 / -0

    I guess someone should ask Floyd what happened, then.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page