I think Woodhead might be slightly better than you say, but I agree he is more of a situational player than a primary threat. That is the thing I don't get about the people who are dumping on Vereen in this thread. He is being penalized because he isn't Darren Sproles (who I think the Pats model how they want to use him even if he isn't as good). I think both Vereen and Woodhead are solid change of pace/third down backs. I think when healthy, Vereen is far better. The problem with Vereen is over three years thus far, he hasn't been healthy nearly enough. As for the contrarian thing, I don't like it. I just want to be loved.