Welcome to PatsFans.com

On the plus side, how about Kevin Faulk?

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by RIpats88, Oct 30, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. RIpats88

    RIpats88 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,377
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +44 / 0 / -0

    after not being on the field in over a year, he looks like he hasnt missed any time...I was surprised that he seemed to be the main back over BJGE this week. he ran the ball well, and made some nice catches in the passing game

    he really was the only player(besides andre carter) that looked like they came ready to play this week
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 31, 2011
  2. Modest

    Modest Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,002
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Faulk looked ok but I could have done without losing a game because of the Faulk Reunion Tour.
  3. SoonerPatriot

    SoonerPatriot Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    3,318
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    He looked okay. Nothing special. Nice to see him get some snaps, but not at the expense of Ridley who didn't get one carry today.
  4. ausbacker

    ausbacker Brady > Manning. PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    Messages:
    13,473
    Likes Received:
    181
    Ratings:
    +516 / 10 / -4

    #51 Jersey

    Would have preferred more Green-Ellis and Ridley. Faulk did look OK, which was pleasing to see.
  5. RIpats88

    RIpats88 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,377
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +44 / 0 / -0

    BJGE looks like he might be hurting and hence why less snaps and not too many yards per carry when he did get them

    I wouldve liked to see more Steven Ridley however...we never really got our running game going today which in turn hurt our passing offense
  6. folamzz

    folamzz Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I actually think faulk kinda held us back. Ridley could have done more with the opportunities faulk had
  7. TommyBrady12

    TommyBrady12 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2008
    Messages:
    3,805
    Likes Received:
    89
    Ratings:
    +238 / 29 / -14

    #12 Jersey

    Faulk is on the team because he's belichick's binky. he's 35 and should have gracioiusly retired instead of taking snaps away from ridley, green ellis and woodhead. im not happy with him being on the team because the patriots made room for him by cutting bodden, who wouldn't have made a huge difference today, but we are already thin at DB. since the beginning of the year, we've cut bodden, meriweather, sanders (bonehead move) and page.
  8. Patriot Missile

    Patriot Missile Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2005
    Messages:
    5,496
    Likes Received:
    59
    Ratings:
    +166 / 4 / -2

    #75 Jersey

    Was kind of meh on it actually. He looked good but personally I'd rather have the combo of BJGE, Ridley and Woodhead. Way more unpredictable.
  9. andrewgarrr

    andrewgarrr Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2010
    Messages:
    2,149
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Looks like the injury and age caught up to his legs. Still looks like one hell of a blocker.

    Brady and Faulk's 40 times might be too close for comfort at this stage in his career.
  10. PATSYLICIOUS

    PATSYLICIOUS Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    11,075
    Likes Received:
    24
    Ratings:
    +88 / 0 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    Wasn't all that impressed aside from the blocking. Don't see what he did on the runs that Ridley/Woodhead couldn't have done or done better.
  11. patsinthesnow

    patsinthesnow PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,737
    Likes Received:
    332
    Ratings:
    +597 / 14 / -5

    #87 Jersey

    On the minus side, why is Kevin Faulk still playing?
  12. RIpats88

    RIpats88 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,377
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +44 / 0 / -0

    he probably played so many snaps today because of his blocking abilities...the steelers were getting at brady ALOT
  13. Ghost of Ben Dreith

    Ghost of Ben Dreith Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2006
    Messages:
    978
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    As much as I like Faulk and appreciate his work over the years....as most of the other posters.....I would rather see BJGE, Ridley, and Woodhead.

    He is the anti-Bodden and therefore BB will make room for him.
  14. letekro

    letekro Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2005
    Messages:
    4,178
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +17 / 2 / -3

    I like Faulk better than Woody at this point, but Ridley should've gotten some snaps today.
  15. andrewgarrr

    andrewgarrr Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2010
    Messages:
    2,149
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Why didn't they use Woodhead, Ridley, BJGE?

    1. They didn't have time to run the ball.

    2. Steelers were bringing the heat. Needed the best backfield blocker.
  16. Patjew

    Patjew PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Messages:
    9,618
    Likes Received:
    53
    Ratings:
    +133 / 2 / -1

    No Jersey Selected

    I loved seeing KFF out there.
  17. Sean Pa Patriot

    Sean Pa Patriot Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,228
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    i think we could have gotten the same production out of woodhead... seriously faulk was overused today.. and where was ridley and the runnign game...
  18. stcjones

    stcjones Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,733
    Likes Received:
    9
    Ratings:
    +34 / 13 / -7

    #12 Jersey

    Love Kevin....will always love Faulk.....but if at this point in your offense you are NOT going to utilize Ridley and Vareen....why the F*ck did you draft them (BB)? With Faulk back, is there a need for Danny Woodhead at this point? Could we not have used more BJGE today...why was it "all faulk...all the time?"

  19. RussFrancis

    RussFrancis Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2007
    Messages:
    929
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    THIS.

    I feel no need to bash Kevin Faulk, one of my all time favorite Pats, on a day when every other aspect of this team was pretty much sucking, but WHY is he coming back for the Steelers on the road for his 1st action since the ACL??? Why? Love the guy. Absolutely love him. He's 35. He hadnt played in over a year. This was the game to work him back in? Im quite puzzled by that.
  20. RIpats88

    RIpats88 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,377
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +44 / 0 / -0

    danny woodhead is younger and faster than Faulk....he put up 1000yards from scrimmage last year, his first year...something Faulk's only done once I think...so yes, there is a need for Danny Woodhead on this team...especially considering faulk is probably gone next year
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>