ATippett56
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2005
- Messages
- 11,346
- Reaction score
- 1,111
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.The OL protection has been horrible, but he badly missed some easy throws the past few weeks. The one where he had Gronk all by himself about 7 yards away was hideous today. Also the endzone pass to Amendola was his fault. He's lucky he did not have 2 INTs today.
He has every right to be shaken by the horrible OL protection. That does not mean we have to close our eyes to the fact that, at this moment in the season, he appears out of sync.
They gave up 33 points to the Dolphins.
Then held down the "vaunted" Vikings and Raiders (something that WOULD have been impressive in the 1970's).
Tannehill, Cassel and Carr?????
They're going to have to be ready for Rivers, Manning, Luck and Rodgers later this year.
Something is really off with this team. I cant really pin it on just one thing, or person. Its just....off. The playcalling, who's getting playtime, who's not. One week our D is rushing the passer like hell on wheels, the next wk we play against a rookie and can barely touch him. Its awkward to watch. Clearly, I hope for the best. By week 6, things will be coming together perhaps? I honestly dont know. I just hope the boys can hang in there and squeak out some hard fought wins by the time that happens.
I don't think this is a bad team ... what I think is this team is not as intelligent as teams that we have been accustomed to ... they make too many mental errors over the course of the 60 minutes. The veterans who can compensate for some of this are coming off injuries or playing with injuries from last year.
I thought that 4th down-- throwing mid out of bounds -- was pretty risky as it appeared to me in realtime that there was a second still left on the clock when the ball when out of bounds, and could've lead to a disastrous last chance for Oakland
So given the scenario -- about 8 seconds extra than what kneel down provides
I'm okay with them doing the delayed kneel instead of running the ball as there's a reduced chance of fumble.
But on that last play, with 3 seconds, instead of what brady did, i'd rather have:
1. He have thrown it deeper down the middle (just pick a spot where no player was), thus the clock doesn't stop till the ball hits the ground
2. He could've gone ran back with the ball thru the endzone; safety, but chewing off the 3 seconds, but even if there was a second left we'd just squib it on the kickoff
3. Just punt it away out of bounds -- also likely to get 3 seconds, worse case it gets a safety if they block it
nitpicking here, but it really looked like we only took off 2 seconds on that last play and if I was an Oakland fan, i'd be pissed that they didn't check the time.
I think people have a right to be disappointed though. I thought they would have come out and killed Oakland since it was a home opener and the O needed to show what it could do.Jeez you wouldve thought we lost today and are 0-3 judging by the posts on this board
Well...it wasn't the best performance but this was a win against a team with their HC on the hotseat and everything to play for. Scrappy in the trenches and the Raiders played tough. Not a great game for ESPN highlights, but a win none the less.
I am NOT suggesting that I would like us to have anyone else as our top corner. I simply expected more.I keep telling myself a few things as it pertains to this subject:
--he's helping the overall scheme and in ways that we may not be able to see as easily as the one vs one matchups. He's doing his job on a lot of plays that we don't realize, which likely shifts the target and other aspects
--we haven't used him in the press man coverage as much as we'd like, at least as much as I can tell in the first 3 games. Obviously this does not utilize his strengths as much
--Revis has been known to have some off games at times. Just look it up during his time with the Jets and Bucs
--no matter what, I'd still rather have him over Talib due to the health factor, attitude, and toughness alone
I couldn't watch the second half, but wasn't Carr getting rid of the ball as soon as it touched his hands? I'm reading people say he had all day???
I do question what game some posters were watching when they see a rookie QB on the road in his 3rd game, throwing strikes in 5/6 opportunities against our supposed "shutdown" CB (along with a DPI penalty) and then walk away thinking "that was a solid effort, he looked very good...." LOL
Revis didn't even have an incomplete attempt until the final drive of the game, and that's out of 7 attempt including his DPI penalty vs a rookie QB. I don't think we're necessarily seeing "bad" performances. I think mediocre is much more indicative.
Thru three games, the New England Patriots have scored 12 points in the second half with ZERO touchdowns.
Jeez you wouldve thought we lost today and are 0-3 judging by the posts on this board
Thru three games, the New England Patriots have scored 12 points in the second half with ZERO touchdowns.