Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by PressCoverage, Feb 20, 2008.
it 's gonna be a long marathon til November , just get your popcorn ready .
There is more to come.
This is exactly as I predicted... they lobbied hard for him to get the nomination and virtually the second that was secured, they turn on him.
Is there anyone here who honestly didn't see this coming..?
Isn't the NYT the same paper that first broke the Matt Walsh story. HMMM
Ummm. I believe that was our very own Boston Herald.
No it wasn't. The NYT was the first by a day.
OK, link please? The ESPN story cited a Boston Herald report from Feb. 2. A story by John Tomase that went on the Herald web site at 1:14 a.m. that day.
Nevermind, found it... Though, the NYT piece never asserts Walsh taped the Rams walkthrough, only that he didn't wanna talk. The Herald Tomase story is what broke the details.
Actually, tomASSe made up the details . . . but that's another issue.
Dirty stinking mother f-cking rat bastard scumsucking c-ck sucking left wing sore losing Bush hating rotten f-cking democrat ball sucking pigs.
This will create a BACKLASH and Mccain will kick the sh!t out of the Clintons and the F-cking Prince Obama a$s hole and the whole rotten scumbag democrat party.
The NY Times is most BIASED dishonest rag crap paper in the world.
This is the best thing that could happen to Mccain and the republicans.
They are now reporting that the a$s wiping Prince Obama "democrat groupies" applaud when this f-cking jerk Obama coughs, America will never elect this "rock star" as their President.
So if your running for President you can't play sink the sub?
The job does not pay well .. the hours are long and the pressure intense.
You cannot have sex unless you are married ... why bother better to be a do nothing Congressman or Senator.
Mccain has got to much "liberal" in him for me but after this NY Times biased hatchet job I have decided to vote for him.
Seriously... it's hilarious (and shameful) how they do an immediate 180 on the guy the same month they were endorsing him...
Oh, but I keep forgetting... only FoxNews is biased... :rofl:
Bomshell........... I was expecting something exciting. What a yawner
... and I'm not even a big McCain supporter.
Now, I understand how you have little-to-no understanding of the many facets of a newspaper, and can't get your hillbilly head around the profound difference between news reporting and op-editorial, but this takes the cake is displaying your profound ignorance and misplaced outrage at every turn.
A reporter with a scoop is in no way beholden to an editorial board at a media outlet. I know you prefer to subscribe to state run media like FiX News, where everyone has the same directive, but at the New York Times, they do it a bit differently.
50 bucks says you didn't even read past the first few paragraphs...
The NY Times has become disgraceful it belongs on the Supermarket checkout shelves alongside the rags that always have Queen Oprahs fat puss grinning at you when your trying not to look at her.
It is getting to the point now that nobody gives a sh!t what they say anyhow there are to many other news outlets now to bother reading the "Times Rag" I don't think Mccain should worry over this, it might even help him.
You're another one who clearly doesn't have a clue regarding the role of a newspaper and its many facets. And you're 80-something.
As much as you'd prefer to blow up the Times and replace it on the newsstand shelves with the Weekly Standard, it's not ever happening, and the NYT, for all their CORPORATE fouls in enabling the Iraq invasion, is still among the best newspapers in the world.
If they had a scoop on Hillary with a woman, or Barrack doing crack, rest assured they would run it also. Unfortunately for your kill-em-all agenda, they don't.
Now now.. don't throw a temper tantrum just because (once again) I am completely right about something. I said as soon as McCain got the nomination, the moonbats would turn on him.
Keep your cowboy hat on...
You mean like when MSNBC buried the story on Monica Lewinsky..?
Dumb much, cowboy ..?
So, in typical fashion, because you won't acknowledge a single undeniable point in my post, we'll chalk it up as another in a long line of capitulations whereby you look stupid and have absolutely no idea what you're talking about when it comes to the CORPORATE media.
Take care, Anne , you robotic tool.
Separate names with a comma.