Patradomous
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
- Messages
- 3,552
- Reaction score
- 298
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Why is the magic # 38?
teams that scored 38 or more in the playoffs are 0-12 ats (1-11 su) against teams that scored 28 or less in their own playoffs game.
That would be 0-12 Against the spread. 1-11 Straight up.
Just sayin
Ok, so low-scoring teams beat high scoring teams? yup, makes sense!
teams that scored 38 or more in the playoffs are 0-12 ats (1-11 su) against teams that scored 28 or less in their own playoffs game.
That would be 0-12 Against the spread. 1-11 Straight up.
Just sayin
teams that scored 38 or more in the playoffs are 0-12 ats (1-11 su) against teams that scored 28 or less in their own playoffs game.
That would be 0-12 Against the spread. 1-11 Straight up.
Just sayin
Nobody wants them to win more than I do.
This forum is loaded with stats of every sort.
I'm just posting one that does not bode well for our Pats if it holds up.
I like to bet for amusment only.I am betting Balt. +7 hoping the Pats win by 6. I was 4-1 last week using certain playoff trends.
By the way here is another trend for you teams in the playoffs who beat SB champs don't cover the next week. SF is my other play.
When I read that stat it sounded a bit far fetched, aside from the fact that it is worded in a very vague manner. Sure enough I did some checking and the record they give for SU doesn't hold true. Since 1990, by my calculations, teams that fit that criteria are 8-10. Now I may be off by a game or two since I simply did a quick check, but I'm sure as heck not off by 10.teams that scored 38 or more in the playoffs are 0-12 ats (1-11 su) against teams that scored 28 or less in their own playoffs game.
That would be 0-12 Against the spread. 1-11 Straight up.
Just sayin