TriplecHamp
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2009
- Messages
- 5,863
- Reaction score
- 381
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Next week is a perfect test for this edition of the Patriots. The Eagles will put 24-30 points on the board and it will be up to the Patriots to outscore them and use the clock wisely. The running game will be a key to a win or loss.
The OL seems to be finesse.They need to do a better job run blocking.I disagree though.This league has become a passing league and right now this team can be very predictable on offense.They cant stretch the field.Everything seems like a cross-route to a TE.
When the Pats had Moss in 2009, people were biatching that Brady tries to force it down field too much and whatever happened to "Brady's favorite receiver is the open receiver". Now people are complaining there is no deep threat.
Sorry, but a lack of deep threat didn't make BJGE drop a screen pass right to him on the first drive. It didn't make Hernandez drop several passes right to him last night. It didn't make Brady not see several wide open WRs. It didn't make the Pats be ineffective running the ball early.
People want to blame this lack of a deep threat for everything that goes wrong with the offense. In the last two games when the offense exploded in the second half in each game, the Pats still didn't have a deep threat. Guess what? The Pats didn't have a deep threat in any Super Bowl winning season.
This offseason WR will be a priority to improve. Not neccessarily that the Pats need a deep threat (although it wouldn't hurt to have one), but because Branch and Ocho will likely be gone or at least Branch will move to a supporting role. I think this whole deep threat thing is overrated. The Pats need better WRs since right now they only have two that are even fairly consistently productive, but they can certainly do very well on offense next year without a deep threat if they upgrade the position.
the thing is, im not sure we play enough 3 WR sets for someone to have a large impact. Ocho plays 11snaps, Price plays 11snaps....and how many of those were running plays??
I still think the only chance Ocho/Price get more playing time is if Branch or Hernandez are injured.
because right now our offensive set for the majority of snaps is Welker/branch/Gronk/Hernandez/RB
I posted this in another forum. I've always believed this:
I know I'm going to get hammered....but, who gives a ****
Brady has never had a real receiver. Moss is...was the greatest "deep threat" the game has ever seen. I won't debate that at all. However.....When I think of complete WR....he doesn't count. Brady getting the records was nice and all...but, I like what you call "stick movers" at wideout. Someone that can run all the routes. The closest Brady has had to that played for one game with him back in in first year at QB. Terry Glenn....so he doesn't count. Wes Welker? He's a slot guy. Troy Brown? Deion Branch in his prime would be the closest
I'm talking a guy that has it all. Maybe he couldn't get down field quite like Randy Moss....but, essentially could do everything else better. For instances:
Larry Fitzgerald
Andrea Johnson
Steve Smith
Santonio Holmes
Greg Jennings
Roddy White
Reggie Wayne
Those type of WR's you have to worry about them running all the routes. Moss was kind of a one trick pony. I would have rather had one of those guys instead of Moss. I could care less about the records they set in 2007.
Chad Johnson should have been that guy.....but, he is older now....and for whatever reason still doesn't know the feaking playbook.
The first WR competency we need right now is physicality, a man-beater, someone who can can get off jams in press coverage, and create separation vs corners with good man to man skills. That would go a LONG way to helping us be successful in the playoffs.
If that WR can also work the outside and deep threats the entire offense becomes MUCH more difficult to defend.
Lack of a deep threat didnt cause the particular mistakes you pointed out but that doesnt mean a deep threat like Vincent Jackson wouldnt make this offense a whole lot better.
Having Darrelle Revis would make the defense better too.
That isn't my point. Of course having a very good deep threat WR will help the team, but my point was the lack of the deep threat being the problem with the defense is overstated.
We need a physical man-beater that can work the outside and deep zones, I vote for Vincent Jackson!
I know he punched his teamate in face....but, do you realize how much better this offense would have been with a guy like Steve Smith