Amazing how the media can create a firestorm merely by "suggesting" that the Pats "may" be interested in a WR
Just like some fans here as so quick to make every available WR better than what we have. Its a league wide monomania concerning WR's. It used to frustrate me to no end. Now I'm coming to terms with it.
If you have a great QB, then have a Great player at ANY other position will have more impact on the team than a so called great WR. About the only time having a "great WR" becomes critical to your team is if you DON'T have a great QB.
I want to thank Chip Kelley for showing us how LITTLE impact losing a "great WR" actually is in the great scheme of things, by cutting his best WR for nothing. Anyone want to bet the Eagles still aren't one of the better offenses in 2014, without Jackson? Didn't anyone notice that even though we lost the greatest slot receiver in NFL history, his $750,000, much maligned replacement out produced him by almost 30 catches and 300 yds.
OMG I'm ranting, aren't I.
Disclaimer: YES, I would much rather if our current WR's were AJ Green, and Julio Jones.
NO, I would not be happy if I had to pay each of them over $10MM/yr. Brown, Branch and Givens were all rather average in physical talent, but they were all smart, dependable route runners with good hands....and they have 7 superbowl rings between them. That's 7 more than Bryant, Green, Jones, Fitzgerald, AJohnson, CJohnson, and even the great Randy Moss have combined.
I don't mean to demean the great physical talents of these great WR's. I only point it out to make my point, which is, you don't need great WR's to win in this league. But you do need good, dependable, and smart ones. And I think, right now, the Pats have to potential to have those qualities on their team..... IF the last year's rookies progress as we hope they will.
Than being said, I'm sure the Pats are going to start camp with about 12-15 WR's on the roster, so we ARE going to sign some vet FA's eventually.