NFL flip-flops, says Hobbs call was correct

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by pats1, Jan 28, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. pats1

    pats1 Moderator PatsFans.com Supporter

    http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/articles/2007/01/28/nfl_hobbs_call_was_correct/

    Aiello is full of ****. Hobbs never contacted Wayne.
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2007
  2. BradyManny

    BradyManny Pro Bowl Player

    I threw up a little in my mouth when I read that article this morning.

    Hobbs made NO contact with Wayne.

    If I'm not mistaken, the ref when announcing the penalty even said "the defensive back made no play on the ball". Bottom line, they called face-guarding and it's not a penalty, so they F'd up.

    Fu*k the NFL & the officials. Grow a pair and admit you fu**ed up or say nothing about it at all.
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2007
  3. BradyManny

    BradyManny Pro Bowl Player

    Yeah, & the worst part is that the ref says "he must have made contact with the receiver"...is it really THAT hard to believe that an NFL official made a MISTAKE??
     
  4. RyanTheColtsFan

    RyanTheColtsFan Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    What do you mean flip flops? Axe Vic said the wrong call was made. The actual NFL said the right one was made. Big difference.
     
  5. Bella*chick

    Bella*chick Addicted to the light

    #12 Jersey

    Ridiculous. I am sick to my stomach.

    I bet Polian had something to do with this.
     
  6. AdamJT13

    AdamJT13 Practice Squad Player

    There was contact on the play -- when Wayne tried to reach up for the ball, his left arm made contact with Hobbs' helmet.

    Hobbs didn't initiate the contact, but that might not matter. If he's not playing the ball and Wayne is, any contact might constitute pass interference, as long as Wayne is making a bona fide effort to catch the ball.
     
  7. RyanTheColtsFan

    RyanTheColtsFan Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    How about Patriots fans move on?

    That call did not cost the Pats the game, regardless.
     
  8. RyanTheColtsFan

    RyanTheColtsFan Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    I believe PI should have been called on either Harper or David covering Caldwell.

    Other than that... the Patriots should have won this game on the field. Couldn't run the ball, catch the ball, or defend the ball in the second half. The Patriots team blew the football game. Not the refs. Get over it and move on.
     
  9. RyanTheColtsFan

    RyanTheColtsFan Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Whats that supposed to mean? That NE will take down Indy in the future? Maybe. But after winning 2 at your place and one at the Dome last Sunday, I doubt very much the Colts are scared of NE.
     
  10. RyanTheColtsFan

    RyanTheColtsFan Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Right. And the Patriots had their share of gifts from the officials when you're dynasty was alive.
     
  11. fgssand

    fgssand PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    #12 Jersey


    Sux for us to have had the officials calls and non calls go against us - However, what stays with me is:

    3:22 - Patriots ball and we cannot muster a first down. Then - we could not hold your team as you rammed the ball down our throats for 80 yards. During the drive, we did not use our time outs properly further handicapping any chance of a magical last minute come back.

    NO way do I blame the refs and NO way will I slight your teams accomplishments last Sunday.

    You won it - you did it now go enjoy your Superbowl and win the damn thing!!
     
  12. CheerforTom

    CheerforTom Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    I don't understand why people say two of the things you say here. Amazingly, it's only one sentence.

    Yes, we've had our share of "gifts" (the tuck rule for one), but why does that make it illegitimate to complain when crap calls get made against us? That logic would only work if when we got our gifts our reaction was "YES PERFECT CALL HOORAY FOR THE REFS WE ROCK!", and if that's what you think then you're wrong.

    If we win the Super Bowl next year, no one will deny that it is part of the current Patriot dynasty. Therefore, how can anybody call it dead? Oh right, cause they hate the team.
     
  13. patriotspride

    patriotspride Banned

    trust me the dynasy is still alive its just on a break.two first rounders and alot of cap space put the pats in great shape next year.the colts on the other hand better win this year.have you seen the colts rfa and ufa ?there are 18 of them total .your going to wish you team handled the cap better .the pats hit a valley this year and were still just a third down and four away from the sb.somthing tells me the colts valley will be alot deeper .
     
  14. Bella*chick

    Bella*chick Addicted to the light

    #12 Jersey

    You know, Ryan, if I were a Colts fan I'd be hanging out on, say, a Colts board instead of antagonizing another team's fans about a game you've supposedly "gotten over".

    Just a suggestion.
     
  15. upstater1

    upstater1 Pro Bowl Player

    Um, the ref himself called a face guard penalty.

    How do you square that with the fact that such a penalty doesn't exist?
     
  16. SoonerPatriot

    SoonerPatriot In the Starting Line-Up

    Which begs the question, don't you have any internet friends who are Colts fans?
     
  17. upstater1

    upstater1 Pro Bowl Player

    No, we actually didn't. New England was repeatedly screwed by the refs and won anyway, until Denver last year.

    Oh, and the dynasty is still alive.
     
  18. RyanTheColtsFan

    RyanTheColtsFan Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Antagonizing? Or making my point of view clear.

    Just a fact.
     
  19. RyanTheColtsFan

    RyanTheColtsFan Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    I didn't know this was a Patriots fan only forum? If it is, please feel free to have Ian ban me for being a Colts fan.
     
  20. SoonerPatriot

    SoonerPatriot In the Starting Line-Up

    I saw that about the dynasty. He's been getting his little shots here and there all week. He pretends to respect the Patriots etc., but clearly there are some emotional issues that have come to the forefront since last weekend that he's trying to resolve here. Strange really. Just another troll at the end of the day.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page