Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by Wolfpack, May 13, 2012.
Well I sure the Obama campaign will be just thrilled by this cover. :rofl:
Yawn, did you see the current Time cover?
The print media's in a general death rattle
Every cover now is a desperate lottery ticket.
There is no substance for the right, so lies suffice...
Man, you really, really do despise any viewpoint but the liberal's, don't you?
I take the perspective that everyone has a right to their political opinion. And that one is no better or worse than the other.
The powers that be want Americans to be divided....looks like they got to you.
Thanks for stalking, again..
Always find it interesting that your derogatory comments are reserved exclusively for the left, but there is silence for the absurdity of the right.
Just follow along, it is an amazing way to live.. thanks for stalking though.
Calling Obama gay isn't a political opinion. Its just a dumb thing to say.
Calling Obama gay is reason # 435 why we can't decent people to run for public office. Newsweak is now jumping into the tabloid business and doing what they can to survive another issue deadline...one of their last gulps of air. Soon the WSJ will be publishing photos of topless women and dispatching papparazzi crews to the Soho nightclubs. Needle is in the red on the lame-o-meter this time. I feel bad for the Prez this time when I think about his wife and kids. I hope they're all laughing their arses off at this.
Print media is giving away nails for the coffin? Hey, let's travel back in time and guess what they would have called LBJ when he called for civil rights legislation. I really did not care one way or the other in regards to Obama's decision. But for a major magazine to call Obama gay for his decision, will hurt the magazine exponentially more then Obama.
Here's the litmus test: who is going to believe it versus who is going to think it is in bad taste?
Quoting for posterity. This point should be driven home.
I'm satisfied that he did it, but it will make little difference this November. Unless something major happens (disaster) then this election is going to be all about the economy. Obama will not pick up any moderate votes on this issue and may in fact lose a few conservative democrat votes.
So this Newsweek cover will give people something to talk about for a week ... no more and no less.
Wait, you're calling Newsweek the political right? That's priceless if you have ever read them in the last few years as they are the journalistic equivalent of MSNBC, far to the political left..... Sorry, thanks for playing though......
Newsweek and That Neverending Liberal Media Bias | FAIR Blog
Newsweek cover- "Why are Obama's critics so dumb?"
Newsweek Contributor Compares Ann Romney to Hitler and Stalin on MSNBC | NewsBusters.org
Newsweek Contributor Compares Ann Romney to Hitler and Stalin on MSNBC
Whats wrong with being Gay?
Can you or someone else explain how calling Obama "The first gay president" is any different than Clinton being called "The first African-American president"?
I don't go around telling one side that they're brainwashed, acuse them of re-gurgitating righty or lefty blog-talk, walk "lock-step" or constanty refer to one side or the other as "The Right" or "The left"....
I could care less if people are liberal or conservative....but I'll admit I hate communists....
James Buchanan: America
Does Clinton still have that distinction or is he now the second..............
They dumped The Clintons like hot coals when Jug Ears showed up and started making their "legs quiver"
I thought this one was a bit less heavy-handed than the Newsweek cover, but maybe that's just me.
Why doesn't "Gay America" realize that Obama is just Using Them.
Ok....so Romney, at one time, was all for gay rights. Now, magically, he's not.
How come Evangalical Christians don't realize he's just Using Them? Political Cruelty.
Separate names with a comma.