Welcome to PatsFans.com

New Jets trade possibility: Sanchez & #16 to Browns for #4 to take Trent Richardson

Discussion in 'Patriots Draft Talk' started by Ochmed Jones, Apr 26, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ochmed Jones

    Ochmed Jones Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    5,750
    Likes Received:
    9
    Ratings:
    +14 / 2 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    Saw on GBN report draft buzz, a hint of a scenario where the Jets trade Sanchez and their first rounder to Cleveland for the #4 pick and the Jets would take RB Richardson of Alabama.

    If the Jets do this, then it is another reason we need Brockers and Reyes for next season.

    Although the thought of Richardson running into Wilfork at the LOS is exciting to think about.
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2012
  2. Gronkandez

    Gronkandez Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Messages:
    1,402
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +17 / 1 / -6

    re: New Jets trade possibility: Sanchez & #16 to Browns for #4 to take Trent Richardson

    Um, Sanchez just restructured his contract so his next two years of salary are guaranteed. I'm no expert but I imagine the cap hit would be ridiculous and there's no chance in hell the Browns would want to pay even half of his salary. :bricks:
  3. randomk1

    randomk1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2010
    Messages:
    3,819
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    re: New Jets trade possibility: Sanchez & #16 to Browns for #4 to take Trent Richardson

    sanchez would get eaten alive in that division

    bengals rising D and ravens,steelers? Twice a year?

    Might as well scratch that career.
  4. Merril Hoge's Tie Knot

    Merril Hoge's Tie Knot Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2011
    Messages:
    1,025
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    re: New Jets trade possibility: Sanchez & #16 to Browns for #4 to take Trent Richardson

    Does Sanchez have any trade value at all?
  5. Ochmed Jones

    Ochmed Jones Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    5,750
    Likes Received:
    9
    Ratings:
    +14 / 2 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    re: New Jets trade possibility: Sanchez & #16 to Browns for #4 to take Trent Richardson

    I have no problem with the Jets absorbing a huge cap hit. And I have no problem facing Tebow twice a year as well.

    I am a little apprehensive about facing Richardson twice a year though. He's a beast and I still think that he could single handedly complete our offense.
  6. everlong

    everlong Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    82
    Ratings:
    +139 / 1 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    re: New Jets trade possibility: Sanchez & #16 to Browns for #4 to take Trent Richardson

    Going from 16 to 4 would mean you value Sanchez at 800 point or equal to the 31st pick. Anybody trade 31 for Sanchez straight up?
  7. PATSNUTme

    PATSNUTme Paranoid Homer Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2005
    Messages:
    15,209
    Likes Received:
    61
    Ratings:
    +97 / 2 / -1

    #75 Jersey

    re: New Jets trade possibility: Sanchez & #16 to Browns for #4 to take Trent Richardson

    That was debunked, YESTERDAY, I'm sorry to say
  8. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    9,008
    Likes Received:
    40
    Ratings:
    +98 / 0 / -1

    No Jersey Selected

    re: New Jets trade possibility: Sanchez & #16 to Browns for #4 to take Trent Richardson

    Less than Mallett, I'd think.
  9. Ochmed Jones

    Ochmed Jones Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    5,750
    Likes Received:
    9
    Ratings:
    +14 / 2 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    re: New Jets trade possibility: Sanchez & #16 to Browns for #4 to take Trent Richardson

    Why wouldn't Sanchez have trade value? He has been fairly successful in the regular season and has 4 post season road wins.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>