Handel
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
- Messages
- 654
- Reaction score
- 10
Not in order of need:
QB: Since Cassell will probably be the established backup QB, we could need a rookie as 3rd string. Not a high priority since it could be a veteran too.
WR: A late round WR to add some depth.
TE: Since Graham could leave, we should need a replacement. Anyway, we draft a TE each year.
DE: If Marquise Hill busts, we need some depth behind Seymour, Warren and Green.
LB: Starters are becoming "old" and depth is unproven or perennial STer. We need young guns at this position, especially inside.
CB: I don't know. Belichick seems to prefer to get veteran at this spot (Stuarks, Warfield, Chad Scott, etc.), I wonder if we will draft a CB next year. We have some young adequate if not solid CBs in Samuel, Hobbs and cool. Maybe another midround rookie would be enough.
QB: Since Cassell will probably be the established backup QB, we could need a rookie as 3rd string. Not a high priority since it could be a veteran too.
WR: A late round WR to add some depth.
TE: Since Graham could leave, we should need a replacement. Anyway, we draft a TE each year.
DE: If Marquise Hill busts, we need some depth behind Seymour, Warren and Green.
LB: Starters are becoming "old" and depth is unproven or perennial STer. We need young guns at this position, especially inside.
CB: I don't know. Belichick seems to prefer to get veteran at this spot (Stuarks, Warfield, Chad Scott, etc.), I wonder if we will draft a CB next year. We have some young adequate if not solid CBs in Samuel, Hobbs and cool. Maybe another midround rookie would be enough.