Welcome to PatsFans.com

NCAA HoopsPool for Patsfans

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by FreeTedWilliams, Mar 12, 2007.

  1. FreeTedWilliams

    FreeTedWilliams pfadmins PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    5,346
    Likes Received:
    64
    Ratings:
    +163 / 31 / -3

    #75 Jersey

  2. bakes781

    bakes781 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    Messages:
    2,913
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

  3. patsfanofNC12

    patsfanofNC12 Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,266
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Go Duke! Even though (no offense to them), they probably won't win it all.
  4. patsfanofNC12

    patsfanofNC12 Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,266
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    By the way anybody else think that Drexel, and Florida State got ripped off?
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2007
  5. bakes781

    bakes781 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    Messages:
    2,913
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    Drexel yeah, but FSU not so much. I think the committee over valued the ACC as it is by giving Duke & BC such high seeds. I also think they gave too much stock to the conference tourneys. I thought USC was a bubble team & they ended up with a #5 seed! :eek: Arkansas & Stanford probably didn't deserve to get in & I thought Nevada should have been ranked MUCH higher.
  6. wdkantro2

    wdkantro2 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    1,135
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Absolutely Drexel got shafted. I love how the head of the committee commented on how many teams won 20+ games, and they proceed to put in an 18 win at large team in Stanford. Plus, BC being seeded higher than Marquette is lunacy.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>