My hopes for a reasonable, cheap WR corps

[Digger44]

This is pretty reasonable without breaking the bank. It may take a while to come together, but it could be done.

1. Branch
2. Moulds
3. Keyshawn
4. Patten
5. Childress

I would be pretty happy with this group.

 

[stevedogc]

Here's mine:

1. Branch
2. Moulds (Price is Moulds does not get released or is asking to much $)
3. Gaffney
4. Az-Zahir Hakim
5. Mike Hass (draft)

This is pretty reasonable without breaking the bank. It may take a while to come together, but it could be done.

1. Branch
2. Moulds
3. Keyshawn
4. Patten
5. Childress

I would be pretty happy with this group.

 

[BelichickFan]

This is pretty reasonable without breaking the bank. It may take a while to come together, but it could be done.

1. Branch
2. Moulds
3. Keyshawn
4. Patten
5. Childress

I would be pretty happy with this group.

I would be very happy with it but I'm not sure how cheap Moulds and KJ will be.

 

[sieglo]

You guys are crazy. No way we could afford any of those groups.

 

[mtbykr]

well

Interesting article:


http://patriots.bostonherald.com/patriots/view.bg?articleid=130586

 

[SeanBruschi54]

Here's mine:

1. Branch
2. Moulds (Price is Moulds does not get released or is asking to much $)
3. Gaffney
4. Az-Zahir Hakim
5. Mike Hass (draft)

No offense but that would be the worst WR corps in years. Branch and moulds are great.

Gaffney cant get open
Hakin annually leads the league in drops
Hass will be a rookie that no one should expect big time production from.

 

[Boston Boxer]

This is pretty reasonable without breaking the bank. It may take a while to come together, but it could be done.

1. Branch
2. Moulds
3. Keyshawn
4. Patten
5. Childress

I would be pretty happy with this group.

I would be very happy with that group.

 

[SeanBruschi54]

This is pretty reasonable without breaking the bank. It may take a while to come together, but it could be done.

1. Branch
2. Moulds
3. Keyshawn
4. Patten
5. Childress

I would be pretty happy with this group.

Great and after the season 2-4 can all retire.

 

[BelichickFan]

Great and after the season 2-4 can all retire.

Right now I think we'll let 2007 worry about itself, we have enough WR for 2006 to worry about

 

[mgteich]

Sure, this group is fine. I would expect a draftee to be #5, and Childress to be #6. Thsi group also would be quite reasonable in price (presuming no extension by Branch).

This is pretty reasonable without breaking the bank. It may take a while to come together, but it could be done.

1. Branch
2. Moulds
3. Keyshawn
4. Patten
5. Childress

I would be pretty happy with this group.

 

[Digger44]

Right now I think we'll let 2007 worry about itself, we have enough WR for 2006 to worry about

that is my thinking

 

[Pats726]

This is pretty reasonable without breaking the bank. It may take a while to come together, but it could be done.

1. Branch
2. Moulds
3. Keyshawn
4. Patten
5. Childress

I would be pretty happy with this group.

OK we agree on Branch....and Childress but no way will they get those 3...lucky to get one of them..I think someone like a ZSmith or a Childress will return kicks..a Troy Brown and a rookie..or 2 rookies...MAYBE a Pattenanad a KJ...but no way all 3. WOn't happen..a nice thought but???

 

[ClosingTime]

Why don't you add T.O. to the Keyshawn, Az-Hakim and Moulds pickups. That would be a REALLY reasonable and cheap group.

 

[Box_O_Rocks]

1. Branch
2. Klecko
3. Brown
4. Childress
5. Draft

In Belichick I Trust (I just know he had Klecko sitting last season while he was making a position change.)

 

[JoeSixPat]

This is pretty reasonable without breaking the bank. It may take a while to come together, but it could be done.

1. Branch
2. Moulds
3. Keyshawn
4. Patten
5. Childress

I would be pretty happy with this group.

Any of them would be better than last year's top 5

The thing is, the top 2 carry 80% of the load, with #3 picking up 15% and the last 2 taking on spot duty for injuries and special teams

 

[primetime]

1. Branch
2. Moulds
3. Keyshawn
4. Troy
5. Draft
6. Childress

 

[AzPatsFan]

Answer to the question?

to the poster who was concerned that with the proposed WR set that two would retire after 2006 or more likely 2007.

I have asked the question and not just rhetorically several times to no answer, "Can you be too young?". Right now the only Pats over thirty on Offense are Dillon at 31, and no-longer-a-starter Troy Brown at 34.

It is reasonable to want some veteran continuity on a squad, and the errors conmmitted on Offense prevented them from advancing past Denver. Or have you forgotten? It issi a very reasonable concern, and this proposed WR corps helps answer it.

Furthemore I consider it a major UPGRADE in talent.

You would be fielding three #1 type WRs, and two #1 type TEs as well as a premium QB and a #1 type RB even without any other augmentation and we all expect additions at RB. Compare that to last season with only a single #1 and single #2 at WR, on the roster, the TEs (one of whom wasa essentially a rook), and an injured #1 RB with two rooks on the O-line.