Welcome to PatsFans.com

My Free Agency Thoughts

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by RonBorges, Mar 6, 2007.

  1. RonBorges

    RonBorges Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Hello all, I find myself with some extra time on my hands so I've decided to share some of my free agency thoughts with this board. The honor is yours...

    this could get wordy.
    -I have an opinion on the historical FACT that FA signings rarely turn out as well as expected. There are few examples of big FA deals where the player was as good or better than the money dictated he should be, and tons of examples of guys who never lived up to the deal.
    The most obvious is that players are paid for their resume, for what they were, then deliver th ewatered-down version of what they become when passing their prime.
    A different thought that occured to me recently is that every FA on the market was not resigned by his previous team. The team that knew him the best decided NOT to pay what he wants. That may be the best perspective on FA failures I can think of. There are a couple of types of players who negate that:
    1) Previous team simply cannot afford him (Thomas seems to fit that)
    2) The player was blocked by a great player. (Jarvis Green comes to mind as a guy who may be a very good starter in the NFL, but will never get the chance here. We may choose to not pay him his value, because his role here wouldnt make it worth the cost)
    3) The team rightfully wont pay the player what he wants because he doesn't fit the system. (Vrabel is a good example)
    4) The player decides to move on for non-money issues

    When you balance it out, there are high-risk FAs--those that their own team decide to let walk, and lower risk FAs, those that may fit 1-4 above.

    As far as the Pats moves so far, my take is:

    Thomas. Great signing. Stud player. Bmore would have kept him if they could. Iam not at all concerned about his age. I thinkhe is peaking, and it will be near the end of the deal before he declines.

    Morris. I actually really like this signing. I thought we needed a guy like this who can start if he must, due to a Maroney injury. Faulk is the 'backup' but should stay the backup if Maroney is injured. Morris fits this bill, IMO, and while Faulks role would be bigger if LM was out, Morris can be reasonable effective filling the bulk of Maroney role. If its Maroney 85% of the snaps and Faulk 15%, then its Morris 70% and Faulk 30% if LM is out. However, what I like best about this signing is that Morris is a special teams stud. 2(?) years ago when we tried to sign him, it was almost exclusively for special teams ability. This gives us a special teams stud when Maroney is healthy and a capable fill in if he were not.

    Brady. When you look at the chances Graham got in the passing game, and recognize elsewhere he would get a lot more, it was obvious that we were moving on. Graham is going to be paid as a multi-dimensional TE, while in our system, he was never going to be that. No doubt it is a loss, because he was the best blocking TE in the NFL, but Brady is a very good blocker as well, and while he does not have Graham's speed and athleticism, may actually be a better fit for the routine type of receiving he will be ask (and Graham was asked) to do.

    Welker. I wasn't excited about the possiblity of Welker a few weeks ago, but its growing on me. Welker, IMO, is Troy Brown circa 1998-99. Brown then became a 100 catch guy for a few years, then age set him back to a backup role. Welker may never go beyond the Brown of 98-99, but Brown was very effective before becoming a 100 catch guy. Even more important is the similarities between the 2, short route running and run after the catch ability, and how valuable that is in our system.
    We have really not had the threat of a guy who can catch a 5 yard pass, then make 3 guys miss and end up with 35 yards in quite some time, and our offense is really helped by it.

    I thought Caldwell showed decent rac potential last year---he always looked to escape after making the catch, but never really had a lot of success. I thought Gaffney does not fit the rac mold. Jackson is the speed, and I expect we will see that coming.

    We should know by now its not about comparing to past teams, but if you look at the success we have had in the passing game, it seems Welker can bring what Brown did and Branch later replaced. Jackson adds the speed factor that Patten brought. (In 2004 Patten's speed and deep threat was a big boost to the offense, even though he only caught about 35 passes or so)
    Caldwell/Gaffney seem to be the capable David Givens-type.

    Maybe we do add Stallworth. I'm not so sure we will. If we do, my hopes are not extremely high for him, but I think he could replicate what David Patten did in 01-02 when he caught 60 passes or so. If we do, we will have more depth than playing time at a position where last year we were struggling to sign a guy and get him on the field.
    Really, if you look at the transition in the WR postion from 01-04 (valley to peak) when we started with Brown, Patten and no one, and grew to a very deep and talented unit, we may be making that jump again this time in one off-season.

    Going forward, I'd like to see:
    Maybe another WR like Stallworth.
    1 or 2 OL added in the mid rounds of the draft.
    A 3rd QB who isnt on Social Security.
    One more vet LB who could be a primary backup.
    One more vet LB who is a reliable JAG backup.
    The rest of the LB corps filled out by retianing our own young guys or getting newer versions.
    A day 1 corner who could push for the #3 corner role.
    One safety to add to the mix, ideally a draft choice.

    Of course as cap room dictates, I am all for upgrading any position further through FA in addition to the above.
     
  2. T-ShirtDynasty

    T-ShirtDynasty Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Messages:
    3,562
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    :rofl: :rofl:
     
  3. satz

    satz 2nd Team Getting Their First Start

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,921
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    I join in ... :bricks:
     
  4. patfanken

    patfanken Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    5,840
    Likes Received:
    550
    Ratings:
    +925 / 18 / -11

    #91 Jersey

    Nice job as to your wish list:

    I think you will get wish on this one. Stallworth and Moss are now reasonable possibilities. At worst, I'm pretty sure we can find another Andre Davis to be a speed guy....or we could always resign Bethel Johnson. ;)

    I would be sick if we spend a single pick on an OLman we now have 7 guys on the roster who have been starters and ANOTHER couple like Billy Yates who are soon be graduates of the Donte Scharneccia school of offensive line men. Any OL pick would be a wasted pick THIS year. LBs, WRs, Ss, CB, are the way to go.

    Actually I like the idea of having a guy like Vinnie or Dough as the 3rd man. What does it matter. Brady has proven to be VERY durable, and Castle should be ready if the unthinkable happens

    We need someone to replace both TBC and Don Davis - I think we will sign at least one more LB from FA and at least 2 of our picks in the draft will fill that need. The guy I think will come from no where to play a big role at LB this year will be Barry Gardner.

    In my ideal draft the Pats will fill three of these 4 positions on the first day of the draft - CB, S, LB, WR
     
  5. RonBorges

    RonBorges Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Thanks for your support. There's a sucker, I mean new reader, born every day.
     
  6. gomezcat

    gomezcat It's SIR Moderator to you Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    3,551
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    Great post. I can't believe that AJ has stolen it from you. I've added some Borgesian comments for your perusal. My suggestions are in bold.
     
  7. bucky

    bucky 2nd Team Getting Their First Start

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,717
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Ditto for me. Is anyone going to own up to this?
     
  8. MoLewisrocks

    MoLewisrocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    19,949
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +29 / 0 / -0

    For those who don't get it, Ron can't helphimself from plagerizing even when he's limited to expounding on an internet message board. ;)
     
  9. RonBorges

    RonBorges Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    :ditto: Right, what he said!
     

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>