Tony Cahncuhd
Practice Squad Player
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2007
- Messages
- 227
- Reaction score
- 203
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Another Interesting Stat is Randy Moss has never won playing against Jim Johnson Defense ince he has been in the league
WERE THE EAGLES PHYSICAL WITH MOSS? “They play how they play. They play how they play, so that’s how they play.”
you're right, thats why if i could only have either TO or RM on a team when the rest of WRs are average at best, i'd take TO. he's physical enough to always be a factor even when doubled. RM only shines when there's at least one other big name WR to take the heat off him, like Chris Carter in Minnesota. When Porter got suspended in Oakland RMs stats got suspended too
Lito is one of the best corners in the game and I've always said that if you hit Moss and Jam him at the line he can be taken out of the game. That's why I laughed when people say it's easier to take TO out of a game than Moss, It's not TO is physical and will battle any CB that challenges him. TO, 90% of the time will get off the jam and run a crossing or slant that nets him YAC. Moss can't, you see that if you're physical with Moss he can't hurt you but with TO it's more difficult because you can line him up anywhere on the field. People talk about Moss has better hands, he does, but TO has the intangibles. Heart. So when Moss can't streak down the field wide open for a TD he isn't productive. I think Moss is a great WR I just have to question the people who say he's head and shoulders better than TO, he's not, they're equally talented. Moss has hands, speed, Leaping ability, while TO has strength, Size, toughness.
When TO went up against LIto he had 10 catches, 172 yards 1 td. He was jammed at the line of scrimmage but managed to break away most of the time. He's more physical than Moss could ever be. But that blueprint is wack because the pats will go 19-0 and win the superbowl so it's actually a mute point.
Lol, I love the contrast.Who gives a rats ass? Another talking head with yet another opinion. That's new?!? Stand in line . . . .
http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/showthread.php?t=68939Jaws is usually one of the more measured and sane media members in regards to game analysis. In the midst of the media frenzy over the Patriots, a breath of fresh air.
Pujo, Yeah, the contrast comes in response to a poster who just wants to stir things up. Therefore, the contrast.Lol, I love the contrast.
Also speaking about Jaws...
http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/showthread.php?t=68939
Originally posted by ClevTrev: Regarding the comments on Moss, he's the other shoe to drop according to the media "wish lists." I wouldn't read too much into this, as again, no one is aware of the circumstances surrounding his performance and what the team asked him to do. Let's stay rational with this guy, as he's never shown an unwillingness to be anything other than a good teammate this season. If he can be an effective decoy when he's not at the top of the QB's progressions, then he's doing fine.
Whoa. How do pats fans feel about this? Are your panties in a bunch? LOL http://ledger.southofboston.com/articles/2007/11/29/sports/sports02.txt
Of course, Moss has been held in check before and bounced back with big games. He was quiet against the Redskins (3-47) and then savaged the Colts (9-145) the next week. Still, Jaworski said Moss’ showing against the Eagles would tip the scales in Owens’ favor if he had to pick one of the superstars to be on his team right now.
‘‘Before Sunday night’s game I would have taken Randy Moss. I just did not like some of the things I saw (against the Eagles) - the lack of a consistent effort. I never question the effort of T.O. If you made me pick one of the two, I would probably go with T.O.’’