Welcome to PatsFans.com

MMQB on Moss and Brady

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by MoLewisrocks, Dec 14, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. MoLewisrocks

    MoLewisrocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    19,949
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +29 / 0 / -0


    Saints chase perfection; Colts plan to rest starters; more NFL - Peter King - SI.com
  2. BelichickFan

    BelichickFan B.O. = Fugazi PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    31,386
    Likes Received:
    139
    Ratings:
    +284 / 9 / -9

    #24 Jersey

    Ben Watson certainly isn't "useless as a receiver". He's under used if anything.
  3. Mark.

    Mark. Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Totally agree-He was huge in the first Buffalo game. Don't know why we haven't used him more.
  4. Willie55

    Willie55 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2005
    Messages:
    2,803
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    He had a good game yesterday too, including a touchdown catch.
  5. emoney_33

    emoney_33 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,194
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    Welker would struggle to get 3 receptions passed the LOS if you take Moss out of this lineup. This is a pile of trash piece. His teammates voted him as captain because he's a baby right? Good grief, you all can say it as many times as you want, it's not going to make it true. They are not coddling or babying Moss to prevent him from "quitting" or "tanking". But the naysayers need an out, when he inevitably breaks out for another big game they can point to the "coddling" as bringing him off the "edge". It's so ridiculous, setting up the tired failed argument of Moss being a quitter.
  6. swheeler23

    swheeler23 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    Messages:
    2,066
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Who is MMQB?
  7. Tunescribe

    Tunescribe PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Messages:
    16,221
    Likes Received:
    211
    Ratings:
    +457 / 5 / -10

    #61 Jersey

    Moss doesn't seem to respond to positive reinforcement. He seems to get worse with negative reinforcement. He doesn't seem to perform consistently in very cold weather. What's a coach to do? Maybe BB should bring in a spiritual mentor for the players like Jim Brown, or that Dr. Harry whatshisname who works with the 49ers players. Maybe Randy is injured, depressed, lonely -- who knows? What an odd predicament.
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2009
  8. KontradictioN

    KontradictioN Do you even lift? PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    26,634
    Likes Received:
    375
    Ratings:
    +997 / 24 / -45

    No Jersey Selected

    I disagree on the points about Watson. He's very effective as a receiver when he's allowed to run routes, which is what we're going to need him to do in the last quarter of the season and in the playoffs. Disagree with Moss being "totally useless in the line-up". At this point, he's the best wide receiver we have and, even if he isn't catching the ball, he's a great decoy. Without him, defenses shut Welker down.

    As for the parts I agree with, I agree with his stance about Stallworth and Gaffney over Aiken and Edelman. I really wish those two were still with us. It's still a completely mystery to me, to this day, why they supplanted Stallworth with Gaffney in the starting line-up in 2007 when Stallworth was more effective at drawing double coverage than Gaffney was. But eh, that's over with. Also agree that, if Fewell is smart, he doubles both Welker and Moss and makes the other guys beat him. As much as it hurts this offense, I actually hope teams do that more to force Brady to spread the ball around to guys like Edelman, Stanback, Aiken, and Watson if they are open. While we're hurting for a respectable (that is, a guy that can draw double coverage over Welker) third receiver that make make defenses pay deep, these guys are not all bad options. Edelman is an effective slot receiver, Watson is a good tight end when used correctly, and Aiken and Stanback are capable of getting open in the intermediate routes.
  9. Willie55

    Willie55 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2005
    Messages:
    2,803
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    The know-it-all Peter King.
  10. swheeler23

    swheeler23 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2007
    Messages:
    2,066
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Now I know why I don't know the name.
  11. SVN

    SVN Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Messages:
    22,550
    Likes Received:
    26
    Ratings:
    +44 / 0 / -0

    i have been losing respect for king a lot. Moss was useless yesterday catching the ball but take him out of the lineup yesterday and we wouldve seen how much attention welker and faulk receive. king doesnt seem to have much more football knowledge than any other armchair analyst. Moss is the goat of the week even though the pats won the game. how about the kicker for the cowboys ? Easy to pile on moss because a) his history b)he doesnt respond in the media.
  12. Synovia

    Synovia Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    3,922
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    This is the problem with people who don't actually understand modern football.


    Randy Moss demands double coverage on every play. As long as he demands consistent double coverage, he is helping the offense, whether or not he gets the ball thrown to him. The Panthers doubled him all day, and that left welker, faulk and Watson all in single coverage, and sometimes in no coverage.


    I'll believe Moss is "dogging it" or playing poorly when teams start leaving him uncovered, like they routinely do with Welker.


    That INT was a terrible terrible throw.
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2009
  13. KontradictioN

    KontradictioN Do you even lift? PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    26,634
    Likes Received:
    375
    Ratings:
    +997 / 24 / -45

    No Jersey Selected

    Agreed. I think Brady forced that ball into double coverage because he was trying too hard to get Moss involved in the game. Though interceptions like that are typically the fault of the wide receiver, I never blamed Moss for that yesterday. Moss did dog it out there (alligator arms), but that wasn't his fault. Brady even admitted as much yesterday.
  14. Rob0729

    Rob0729 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    29,753
    Likes Received:
    222
    Ratings:
    +486 / 5 / -1

    I disagree with a lot of this. Yes, if Moss left with this receiving corp (either Aiken or Edelman being the #2 WR behind Welker), I say that Welker would struggle to get 3 catches. But if they had a decent starting WR, Welker would be just fine. Remember that Brady has done very well with receivers like Branch, Givens, and Troy Brown and none were as good as Wes.

    Moss does have a history of getting frustrated in games and if you take him out early he does dog it. That is a fact for his career. That is why I was hesitant for the Pats to get him in the first place. Moss dogged it yesterday. There is no defense for that. He has dogged it several times this year. Is he quitting like he did in Oakland? No. But he isn't giving his best effort every game either.
  15. parthasas

    parthasas Patriots Nation PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    1,536
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    OK, now did Brady really talk to this Drama Queen over the cell phone after the game ? I never understood why players would call him.

    Assuming this is true, Brady has nothing productive to do while going home :rolleyes:
  16. NSpatsfan

    NSpatsfan Rookie

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Y'know its really hard to believe that a guy who is one of the tops in the league in a number of categories, and playing for a divisonal leading team that is 8-5 would get so much crap. I know that he has had his ups and downs this year but so has Brady, reminds me of the whole "body language" debate about Brady a few years back, maybe we should have dumped Brady then yeesh:rolleyes:
    Its a long season with ups and downs, Moss was a monster in the Indy game, and hauled in a TD pass last weekend, and that is just a taste of how he is done this year, so he had a bad game, so he had two, who elso are you gonna put out there? Someone else mentioned that without him Welker is lucky he gets three passes his way, and I really believe that to be the case. The micoscope this team is under right now is freakin crazy, for those out there that remember, to be leading the division in december is not a right of the New England Patriots. I know that for some you have to criticize, not be happy, because you want more, and I understand that, but wholly hell lay off the man already lets see where we are at at the end of the year, there is still lots of football left!!!
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2009
  17. Tunescribe

    Tunescribe PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Messages:
    16,221
    Likes Received:
    211
    Ratings:
    +457 / 5 / -10

    #61 Jersey

    You're a jerk for that "understand modern football" crap. The issues I posed regarding Moss extend above and beyond what's happening on the field. He has a history of such issues, so don't suggest it's all a matter of between the lines. Everyone knows he draws double coverage on a consistent basis, but this offense has wrinkles designed to put him in favorable matchups (i.e., running him out of the slot, etc.). He should be making more than one or two catches a game, regardless. His short-arming a perfect pass on that slant yesterday is one glaring example of something amiss with the guy. I'm a big fan of Moss, but yesterday he did not play with much effort because he either is playing injured or struggling emotionally, or both. I would never suggest taking Moss out of the lineup, but something needs to be done to light a fire under his butt.
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2009
  18. Mark.

    Mark. Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Drives me nuts-Randy's play is getting more attention than the 13-0 Colts and Saints-Why?
  19. NSpatsfan

    NSpatsfan Rookie

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Haters just hatin.............
  20. emoney_33

    emoney_33 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,194
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    Brady is doing better this season than he has any other season aside from 2007. I know Brady is amazing and can make do, but let's not fantasize about things. We had plenty of low scoring defensive games with Branch, Givens, Troy etc...

    A fact? Or a media-driven opinion? Funny even with this fact he still puts up monstrous numbers throughout his entire career. According to this fact, all you have to do is double/triple him early and then he'll shut down the rest of the game. Yet he still puts up the numbers he does over his career, funny how that works. Teams focus on him ALL game, the only way not to is with constant pressure on Brady.

    You think he dogged it because the media has branded him as a player that dogs it. Thus you attribute things to him dogging it. Other players could give the same body language and it would be completely ignored by your subconscious. Moss had a bad game, EVERYONE has bad games. Remember the "Brady body language" season, that was just as much rubbish. But people need something to complain about and someone to blame things on.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>