Before going on a speculative diatribe questioning the respect of Vrabel I suggest you research the context of such a statement. In addition, instead of basing your supposition on snippets specifically chosen by sportswriters to further an agenda, listen to the quote. Note its tone.
Does a context redefine the term "washed up"? It is what it is: A snipe.
Beyond that, you can have reverence for the history of the game without caring about the opinions of retired players and coaches who are, indeed, actively rooting against your team.
Nobody here is suggesting that we agree with anybody who is rooting hard against us. This isn't about agreeing or disagreeing, it's about sniping in a manner which we usually associate with the Bengals or other immature team.
Shula does not get a free pass for making petty, ill-informed comments about a team that is challenging a record once set by his club. I would assume someone so revered would have more respect for himself and the league than to further the image of his club as being vindictive, childish, and egocentric.