- Joined
- May 28, 2005
- Messages
- 13,274
- Reaction score
- 0
Got that right, Willie.
Thanks for Reiss for linking to this story in his blog:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/nfl/20060806-9999-1s6nflcol.html
Thanks for Reiss for linking to this story in his blog:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/sports/nfl/20060806-9999-1s6nflcol.html
...
Now, McGinest is gone, Vinatieri is gone, Law is gone, and Harrison and Bruschi are injured. Couple that with star wide receiver Deion Branch holding out for more money and we could be on the verge of finding out whether one system can actually trump multiple aces.
McGinest doesn't buy it.
“When you start losing your core guys, it's kind of hard, especially when the guys who are coming in don't work as hard or play as hard,†he said this week between practices with his new team, the Cleveland Browns. “It's not always the system. Like I always say, 'Yeah, it's a great system (in New England); but you've got to have great players to play in that system.' I think we kind of found that out last year. The system was great, but it couldn't save us.â€
The Patriots overcame some injuries to win their division with a 10-6 record, but their quest to three-peat ended with a second-round playoff loss at Denver.
“You had Ted Johnson retire and we had injuries,†McGinest said of 2005. “You had Seymour hurt early and Rodney Harrison was out. Those are some of our core guys, and some of the (replacements) coming in were terrible. Duane Starks, he came in and played like trash. He was terrible. You had other guys coming in that couldn't fill the shoes of some of those guys that had been there for years and (were) your core guys.
“You're missing Bruschi, Ted Johnson, Seymour and Rodney Harrison. It was kind of lonely on that defensive side of the ball. . . . As good as this system is, you've still got to have those core players in that system.â€
...
Last edited: