Digger44
2nd Team Getting Their First Start
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2005
- Messages
- 1,962
- Reaction score
- 1
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Could be ......Digger44 said:It not maybe a Watson experiment at WR. We now have the guys to pull it off.
Uhm I said maybe. David Boston didn't have WR quickness when he was healthy. The two TE just taken are valuable as well. Watson may be bigger @ WR.Remix 6 said:why would we move him to WR? Okay his speed but he doesnt have WR quickness..and hes too valuable for us. Graham is out next yr or being traded this year..thats that. Watson is oging to be big for us at TE.
Think of the matchup problems against slot DB's Watson could present ........Remix 6 said:why would we move him to WR?
there is now. lol.desi-patsfan said:is there any such thing as a 4 TE set?
Mills is a FB.Digger44 said:Have no issues with the TE picks. Mills will probably play FB. It not maybe a Watson experiment at WR. We now have the guys to pull it off. Don't count out a Daniel Graham trade either.
I have no prob with that. We can dream. I still said maybe. It would be a mismatch nightmare.Remix 6 said:okay why did we waste a first rounder on Watson few years ago..he played more and more last season..graham is gone next year...pass is small for FB.. i think were using a new offense this year..using H Back..not relying on big backs and all that
did i not write that? hello?Handel said:Mills is a FB.
Remix 6 said:why would we move him to WR? Okay his speed but he doesnt have WR quickness..and hes too valuable for us. Graham is out next yr or being traded this year..thats that. Watson is oging to be big for us at TE.
Digger44 said:there is now. lol.
Digger44 said:did i not write that? hello?