Welcome to PatsFans.com

Marxist Freedom -If We Fail We Don't Want Anyone To Play

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by Harry Boy, Jun 25, 2008.

  1. Harry Boy

    Harry Boy Look Up, It's Amazing PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    41,278
    Likes Received:
    255
    Ratings:
    +995 / 2 / -9

    Skank Pelosi, Sore Losers, Marxist Rat Bastards:

    The left wing failed miserably at "talk radio" nobody wanted to listen or participate to their nasty hatful looney crap so now they want to take away the freedom of the "Talk Shows" that the people DO want to hear, remember, Scummy Pelosi and her kind are the ones that are always bleating and yowling about civil liberties, freedom of speech and condoms for your ten year old boy.

    Today:
    The speaker of the House made it clear to me and more than forty of my colleagues yesterday that a bill by Rep. Mike Pence (R.-Ind.) to outlaw the “Fairness Doctrine” (which a liberal administration could use to silence Rush Limbaugh, other radio talk show hosts and much of the new alternative media) would not see the light of day in Congress during ’08.
    http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=27185#c1

    MARXIST, PROGRESSIVE, SOCIALIST, LEFT WING BASTARD SCUM B!TCHES.

    GOD DAMN AMERICA
     
  2. FreeTedWilliams

    FreeTedWilliams pfadmins PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    5,842
    Likes Received:
    185
    Ratings:
    +515 / 49 / -7

    #75 Jersey

    AAAHHH the party of tolerance...........

    let silence the PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
  3. Harry Boy

    Harry Boy Look Up, It's Amazing PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    41,278
    Likes Received:
    255
    Ratings:
    +995 / 2 / -9

    The sniveling weasle rats can't win the game so they want to take their ball and run home.

    "mommy, mommy, that bad man Limbaugh won't let us win, whaaaaaa sob, gurgle slop"


    Nobody listened to their batty sh!tty radio shows----:singing::singing:
     
  4. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,372
    Likes Received:
    138
    Ratings:
    +370 / 10 / -14



    Ah yes once again the Stalinist tendency of the left to silence their critics comes to the fore.
     
  5. PressCoverage

    PressCoverage Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,608
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    You guys set the standard that way though, didn't you?
     
  6. Lloyd_Christmas

    Lloyd_Christmas I can delete my own crap! PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,418
    Likes Received:
    5
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0 / -0

    They are always tolerant when you agree with them.

    Otherwise, not so much.

    She flat out said she would not support the bill to head off the fairness doctrine because it ran counter to her caucuses' interests.

    Who cares about freedom of speech? If it hurts the rebublicans, it must be good.
     
  7. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    42,769
    Likes Received:
    284
    Ratings:
    +717 / 20 / -30

    Didn't the fairness doctrine begin with the righties whining about comments about Barry Goldwater?? I think so..
     
  8. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,372
    Likes Received:
    138
    Ratings:
    +370 / 10 / -14



    IIRC it went back to the 1930 when there were jsut a couple of radio networks to maintain fairness in the media, today with the proliferation of types of media outlets it is an obsolete concept. Libs apparently can't stand to have any sort of media they don't dominate...

    Like I said Stalinist tendencies.
     
  9. PressCoverage

    PressCoverage Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,608
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    Well, I'm one liberal who doesn't feel this way at all. You guys can have your propaganda networks, as far as I'm concerned. But please don't sit here and pretend that liberals dominate the media. You just sound dumb and dumber each time.

    Regardless, while I would never advocate sensoring or forcing a radio station to provide equal time left or right, I will always be right here pointing out how completely full of shyt hypocrits like goofy, racist Rush Limbaugh truly are. That's also MY right, as well as yours against people like Al Franken.

    But you go right on ahead stupidly labelling all liberals a certain stupid way, and never apologizing for it. It's what you do.
     
  10. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,372
    Likes Received:
    138
    Ratings:
    +370 / 10 / -14


    Well you just stand there at the bulwarks protecting us all.....

    Glad to see you are not for goverment dictating what can be said by the media.

    As to the idea that the mdia in this country isn't biased to the left... well 90% + of journalist over the past 30 years have voted for dems for president, the editorial boards of newspapers in this country are voerwhelmingly liberial and looking at teh tv networks the only network that makes a pretense of offering rw pov is foz, MSNBC, CNN, CBS, NBC, ABC & PSBS aree all very much to the left in their POV.


    I will ignore the personal insult as always.
     
    Last edited: Jun 25, 2008
  11. otis p. driftwood

    otis p. driftwood Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,256
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    The scariest part to me is that most right leaners believe the media is leftist, and most of the lefty types I know believe it's right tilting (or just incompetent--and I don't disagree there)...so does that mean they're actually centrist?

    I don't buy that, do you?
     
  12. STFarmy

    STFarmy In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,677
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    Not really. I said this in another thread today, but I'm not one of the guys that think there's a grand liberal conspiracy in the media. I do, however, think that most of the major players in the big networks (notably CNN, NBC, and the New York Times) have a liberal worldview that subconsciously colors their reporting. Some are better at containing it than others. Russert was a dedicated democrat, but only the most partisan of hacks would claim that he was a biased journalist. Dan Rather, on the other hand, let his opinions creep into his reporting a lot. There's examples of it in Fox news anchors as well on the right (poltical right anyway) side of the spectrum.

    Mostly, however, they're beholden to money and ratings. The minute their ideology has a conflict with their bottom line, they'll ditch the ideology everytime. The Reverend Wright story is an example. NBC probably didn't want to report on that as much as they did, but it was a story that caught people's attention - therefore, they had to report on it to keep their viewership. That's the nature of institutions; from the moment they're conceived, their first instinct is self-preservation. And the media, the government, the church, are all inclined to do this.
     
  13. PressCoverage

    PressCoverage Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,608
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    Yes, of course. Because you're always turning the other cheek and "ignoring the insult" whenever you label me a communist, or a soldier hater, or whatever ridiculous self-rationalization you arrive at.

    Where did you pull that 90% figure out of? It wreaks, so please link. You're going to need to present a bit more than just "its so because I say it's so," as you may have noticed around here. No one takes your pap at face value. You've earned it. Some of us provide links, you almost never do. Your statement above is subjective at best.

    As I've said, if they were left leaning, they'd be anti-war. If they were anti-war, you'd be seeing the carnage on your TV news every night, and you'd see paid peace activists on the same news panel alongside paid military analysts. Newsflash, Bunker: Corporate publishers dictate to newsrooms. I can trot out numerous examples of newspapers muzzling or changing stories at the behest of advertisers and publishers. So just stop.

    Newspapers are reducing staff by 20-40% all over the country. But of course, it's liberals who are laying people off left and right, huh? :rolleyes: Yes, it's liberal policy that would outsource editing of your local news to India.

    OC Register tries outsourcing

    SANTA ANA, Calif. (AP) -- An Indian company will take over copy editing duties for some stories published in The Orange County Register and will handle page layout for a community newspaper at the company that owns the Pulitzer Prize-winning daily, the newspaper confirmed Tuesday.

    Mindworks' Web site says the company is based outside New Delhi and describes its work as providing "high-quality editorial and design services to global media firms ... using top-end journalistic and design talent in India."​
     
    Last edited: Jun 25, 2008
  14. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,372
    Likes Received:
    138
    Ratings:
    +370 / 10 / -14

    Sorry I've linked those polls in the past, try goolge instead of always demanding others be your gofers, BTW I don't care whether you believe me or not.


    I do agree with STF army in his post #12
     
  15. PressCoverage

    PressCoverage Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,608
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    So, you're free to run your mouth without links or accountability for their absense, and we have to go searching to validate your bloviations. Wow, that's excellent. What a convenient form of posting standards you live by, little storm trooper.
     
  16. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,372
    Likes Received:
    138
    Ratings:
    +370 / 10 / -14

    I don't have any respect for you and don't care what you opinion of me is, or whether you believe what I say. When I have provided documentation you refuse to acknowledge it anyway.
     
  17. PressCoverage

    PressCoverage Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2005
    Messages:
    8,608
    Likes Received:
    13
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -0

    Yes, we've established that we both loathe eachother. Respect from you is probably an extended right arm and goose step, so I don't much require your kind of "respect." However, it will reflect upon you with others here when you run your mouth with figures you refuse to back up.

    Ah well... Only trying to help, Archie. You can get back to making up figures that portray how "liberal" the media is, while ignoring the linked facts that portray why it isn't liberal at all.
     
    Last edited: Jun 25, 2008
  18. otis p. driftwood

    otis p. driftwood Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,256
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    As much as you guys enjoy attacking each other (or seem to), maybe we should identify terms?

    Liberal...for right leaners, means everyone who appeared to help Clinton stay in office. And at one time there was a poll where 90-some percent of the media admitted to voting for and supporting Clinton. Now--this may well not make them "liberal", but it does tend to support the "they have an agenda" notion (you can google for that if you need to, or take my word for it). There's also a more recent editorial from the Washington Post ombudsman, who came out with a figure more in the 60%'s...again, you can google it, I don't feel like it right now.

    What I don't know is what PC considers "liberal".

    It just seems silly to throw insults back and forth without figuring out what you're insulting each other about.

    Unless you want to do that--then knock yourselves out! :D
     
  19. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,372
    Likes Received:
    138
    Ratings:
    +370 / 10 / -14

    Media research (a conservative group) collected links and results from a large # of reports on media voting patterns and media opinion about political issues. The reports are from academic and non partisan (pew research for example) groups.

    http://www.mediaresearch.org/biasbasics/biasbasics3.asp
     
  20. Wildo7

    Wildo7 Totally Full of It

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2007
    Messages:
    8,876
    Likes Received:
    36
    Ratings:
    +49 / 16 / -3

    I argued this ad nauseum with Deus in the other Imus thread, but the airwaves are rented for free in return for a public service. That being said, I have a hard time with partisan hacks deciding what is fair. A Coke channel and a Pepsi channel? Ummm no thank you. Pelosi and co. could not possibly be trusted to determine whose viewpoints should be represented. The totally deregulated conglomerates are almost more diverse than that. Almost.
     

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>