Ring 6
PatsFans.com Supporter
PatsFans.com Supporter
2021 Weekly Picks Winner
2022 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 63,761
- Reaction score
- 14,113
Who asked to give him a pass?I know you're probably going to disagree with me, but I refuse to give BB a pass on this, particularly since he chooses to trade down instead of staying put or trading up for a player to fill the role(s). Most of the 3-4 defenses that are there now are new to it. New England doesn't have that excuse. Belichick's been doing things like grasping at the Burgess' of the world while waiting for Shawn Crable in the 3rd round and trading away the best 3-4 DE in a generation.
He chooses to trade down because that is what he sees as best to build the football team. His decisions at OLB for the last TWO YEARS, you know since the year we played with Vrabel and Thomas at OLB, can surely merit criticism. But to sensationlize your viewpoint by blaming it on trading down is lame.
We have 16 players and 9 starters left from 2008, just 2 seasons ago.
That means at least 9 new starters, including 2 OLBs and at least 37 players including 4 or 5 OLBs have been added in the 2 years since OLB started to 'become a problem'. The position, like just about every other position on the team has been addressed. The success rate at is can be questioned, but its function as part of the overall plan is a lot less questionable.
Of course, while discussing OLBs, you must throw in your Seymour whine. We ended up with a LT that could be here 10 years instead of one year of Seymour, yet somehow you continue to want to pretend that you don't realize he was never going to resign here, would have held out if he were franchised and to franchise him would have meant no tag for Wilfork, on top of pretneding we could afford long term deals to each.
But, hey the salary cap hasn't had any effect on teams for many years, right?