- Joined
- Dec 21, 2007
- Messages
- 22,770
- Reaction score
- 15,554
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.You're lying. If you have to resort to blatent lies to assert your case, that proves how bankrupt your statements are. I consistently maintained in that thread that Brady leaving was within the realm of possibility, steadfastly giving an estimate of 25% to 33%.1. You said what you said. You made a desperate argument saying that there was a chance that Brady was going to leave. The conversation had long before turned to Brady going to a California team. Your argument turned into vehemently defending the chance that Brady would do it.
I told you I would gladly answer your questions just as soon as you show us where I said Brady was going to San Francisco. But I will make a second offer: I will gladly answer your questions if you admit you were once again lying and misrepresenting my positions.2. Speaking of weaseling out of things, you still haven't answered either of my questions. So let me ask them again.
You obviously didn't watch the Saints game because they were doing a lot of complaining about it too.First, why is it only the Colts complaining about it? If other teams are so against it, why haven't they gone public? If they have, please provide evidence of it to support your opinion. Secondly, why is it that numerous other teams around the league have been able to execute successful hurry up offenses?
I don't necessarily think they should throw the rule out entirely, just that it needs some tweaking. Although I wouldn't lose any sleep if they did decide it was too disruptive to keep.3. One thing you should realize is that the NFL changes rules all of the time. Some for the better, some for the worse. You would know this if you actually followed the NFL instead of spending all of your time getting owned down in the Political forum. As has been mentioned, any rule that helps the safety of officials not wearing pads should be fine by everyone.
This from the king of weasels. I don't htink you've answered a single question I've asked you in this thread.4. Now, instead of skirting around my questions, how about you try to answer them chief?
It's Sunday evening and I have a few better things to do than look at who is posting insults to who. STOP IT! STOP IT NOW!
A couple of people have been kicked off the thread. The next step is to close it. I'm going to go watch the Steelers game now.
You're lying. If you have to resort to blatent lies to assert your case, that proves how bankrupt your statements are. I consistently maintained in that thread that Brady leaving was within the realm of possibility, steadfastly giving an estimate of 25% to 33%.
Apparently to your undeveloped mind
33% means I "vehemently" said it would happen.
I told you I would gladly answer your questions just as soon as you show us where I said Brady was going to San Francisco. But I will make a second offer: I will gladly answer your questions if you admit you were once again lying and misrepresenting my positions.
Patriots better do something and they better do something soon - and stop using the CBA as a bullcrap excuse. Any impartial observer viewing the situation (and not drinking the kool-aid) sees a quarterback who has already got one foot out the door.
Yeah I know there's no team in LA but there are an awful lot of NFL cities much close to LA than Foxboro.
Last I checked, there were other teams in California than Oakland. And just about every team in the NFL is closer to LA than Boston.
You obviously didn't watch the Saints game because they were doing a lot of complaining about it too.
I don't necessarily think they should throw the rule out entirely, just that it needs some tweaking. Although I wouldn't lose any sleep if they did decide it was too disruptive to keep.
BTW here's a clue for you since you obviously are not a big football fan:
The umpire was in the defensive backfield for about what? 75 years? So feel free to stop acting like getting him out of there at this point in time is a matter of life and death.
This from the king of weasels. I don't htink you've answered a single question I've asked you in this thread.
Fact is all you've done is desperately try to change the subject to Tom Brady, and then deliberately lied about statements I made something like 6 weeks ago. But it's nice to see I am so far in your head that you carry your anger at me around with you.