- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 9,341
- Reaction score
- 7,925
Their offer took the RFA tender into account, Per Reiss, requiring Mankins to play that year as part of the deal. Reiss' report lines up with what Bauer was saying about the actual value of the offer. I'm not changing history.
And, besides Brady, the Patriots treat who damn well?
Branch? No.
Samuel? No.
Seymour? No.
Wilfork? No.
Mankins? No.
Who are these players who've been treated damn well?
Dear Logan,
You're probably spending your time listening to your blowhard agent and reading the internet to make yourself feel mad and badly treated by the Patriots.
So let me put this very simply.
There are two sorts of NFL players: those who come out of their careers with enough money to live well for the rest of their lives and those who don't. Any player who takes a deal with $10 million dollars guaranteed in it has been "damn well" looked after. If you can't live on $10 million, shame on you.
Everyone listed in the post above was offered at least that much guaranteed so yes, they would all have been treated damn well.
Beyond that, of course, there are people who feel "disrespected" if their deal isn't more than someone who isn't as good a player as they are. But that is bullsh*t -- the sort of bullsh*t that is put out by agents and internet smartarse contrarians but actually has almost no bearing on real life. You're disrespected if the franchise won't pay you because they won't use income on salaries, but if the franchise is using the money to pay a couple of million to a lower-tier player, where's the disrespect?
So it's quite simple. Are you going to uproot your life and leave people you care about for money that won't make any serious difference to you? Yes? OK, you're an idiot. Go talk to Deion. At least he came to realize it.
Still want to go? Then goodbye and good riddance,
Mike