- Joined
- May 28, 2005
- Messages
- 13,274
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Definitely need to ink him and Wilfork.
Then Faulk, Guyton, and Ghostkowski(for the right price)
Guyton, Gostkowski, and Mankins are all RFA for 2010. That puts the Pats in the driver's seat for negotiations. One can only hope that the Pats make them good long-term incentive laden contracts...
Guyton, Gostkowski, and Mankins are all RFA for 2010. That puts the Pats in the driver's seat for negotiations. One can only hope that the Pats make them good long-term incentive laden contracts...
Thats the key right there.........RFA. He has no leverage unless he pulls a Branch.
FWIW, Branch was under contract.
I do think that if Mankins really wants a deal, then Kraft will give him a good one. Offensive guard is a big hole in the team's future roster and Mankins is a perennial probowler.
If he doesn't want a deal, then he will get the highest tender and the team will have another year to negotiate with him.
The highest tender for RFAs last year was $2.562M, which would be cheap for a guard of Mankins' caliber, and would require a 1st and 3rd round pick as compensation if he signed an offer with another team and the Pats didn't match it.
I do think that if Mankins really wants a deal, then Kraft will give him a good one. Offensive guard is a big hole in the team's future roster and Mankins is a perennial probowler.
If he doesn't want a deal, then he will get the highest tender and the team will have another year to negotiate with him.
I think as long as the potential for a 2011 lockout remains high there will be no long term extensions that require substantial bonus or guaranteed money beyond TFB. The most likely of the RFA candidates to get extended for that reason will be Gostkowski because as a PK he won't require a double digit guarantee and like Brady his age beyond 2011 won't be a major concern strickly based on position (QB's and PK's play well longer on average).
I also think with Dante still on board and the draft picks they have stockpiled for 2010 and 2011 they won't pay a premium for Mankins. OL has become a very expensive proposition relative to FA while remaining a more predictable position to scout the college ranks for and transition to the NFL, and the draft is definitely the way to go unless guys are willing to play ball on long term deals.
In some respects finding Vollmer made it easier for NE to figure out what to do about Mankins. They don't necessarily have to pinch pennies because they have a LT in the pipeline through 2013 at least, but they will also have to be careful if they want to lock that guy up for beyond since any deal Mankins inks will impact what Vollmer expects in as little as two years down the line.
I think Neal will be resigned for depth and stability because his value here will be greater than anywhere else given his system experience/relevance and injury history. Kind of like the last time he was a FA coming off a SB and not yet 30 and he found no takers or leverage. And of course Light has a year left in which he could still play LT or move inside beside Vollmer while they hunt for a RT or LG with excellent upside in the second. And he too is more likely to find a short term extension here than anywhere given the variables including his being a 33 year old FA in 2011...
Wilfork and Mankins will be secondary priorities behind Brady whose deals are totally dependent on whether their assessment of value in a long term deal aligns with the organizations. The fact that both can be retained through 2010 or traded/signed away for substantial draft compensation dictates that approach play out on a scheme driven, fiscally responsible/conservative team that always balances short term impact against long term goals.