For one, trusting in him to make the right decisions but still being able to weigh each decision on it's own merits isn't the same as blanketing that trust over all decisions made, even in the face of a decision that is overwhelmingly bad. Without trying to take this thread down that road, we still to this day have some people that are backing him on drafting Tavon Wilson that early, even though it's proven to be a bad decision. That's the last I'll comment on that move, too, since (again) I don't want to de-rail the discussion. For another, very few people are overly critical of mistakes. It's when pointing out a mistake is met with such blowback does it look overly critical. For a third, it's obvious that you don't understand what a red herring is.
The fact that you state the above tells me the concept of "below the line" went right over your head. The take away shouldn't have been BB also makes mistakes so every mistake should be constantly regurgitated and criticized. It isn't in fact the overall body of work.
I also find it ironic that your focus on red herring is the only red herring in this entire back and forth. My entire point has been that you misinterpret IBBIT as people saying BB doesn't make mistakes and use his statement that he does make mistakes as some sort of counter to the concept. The reality is that IBBIT is closer to the concept of "below the line" where it is acknowledged that mistakes will be made but that the failure rate versus the overall production is what matters.