Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by Harry Boy, Jan 18, 2012.
No apologies needed, Titus is a lot smarter than he looks.....:singing:
What lie are you talking/writing about Chico? Or were you wrong?
I was wrong, according to 13's research. Unlike other folks here, I have no problem admitting when that's the case.
So now we're just left with innumerable other lies from the same poster.
But we know you're not concerned with those.
You confuse disagreeing with lying a lot.
One thing that it clearly demonstrates is that Harry is not who he says he is, my guess has been for a long time is that he is a personaly needs attendant who revels in the stories of an older man he spends a lot of time with.
No one his age, about 90, can write that well unless they have written all their lives.. knowing a lot of men that age, who have not spent their life crafting the art of writing what he does is nearly impossible.
No, 13, I don't.
Your confusion doesn't surprise me, though. I'll leave it to you whether your post was disagreement or a lie.
wanna see my birth certificate
I take that as a compliment and I thank you.
Yes, well... Unlike some of my RW opponents here, I actually read their links.
I could honestly care less if some of our members lie. Why would I? It doesn't affect me in any way. People know when they lie and they pay a price for it.
Nothing to get all hot & bothered over Chico. It's just a little sub-board on an NFL website.
FYI...there are no "Opponents" here...this isn't a contest. But if you want to believe otherwise, knock yourself out.
You seem much more concerned about other folks' posts than you claim, PR
Personally, I don't like liars. It has nothing to do with whether their lies affect me. I just think liars lack character, and if they'll lie on something as inconsequential as "a little sub-board on an NFL website," then they'll lie when they actually have something to gain from it.
Why does that bother you? I mean, do you care whether or not someone you'll never meet has character?
Of course I react to issues that concern me. That's why I come here. But I'd never click on someones thread to check to make sure what that person posts is valid or not. I only click on posts that interest me and never click on a thread based upon the author.
That would be a tad neurotic, wouldn't it?
If I felt the way you do about Harry, I'd have him on ignore rather than focus on him.
You react to far more than issues, PR. You seem like a good enough guy, but I don't think you realize how often you criticize me and others for doing the exact same thing you go ahead and do yourself.
In this post, you're assuming multiple things that aren't reality. I'm glad you're not neurotic, though -- and I'll never meet you!
As for character, I think anybody who lies about something should be called out on their lies. I don't care if it's an internet post or a fraudulent invoice. It's wrong, simple as that. Since you don't care, go ahead and ignore it.
Some people post with objective of riling up other posters and some take the bait...that's all I'm saying.
I have no intention of riling you up, PR
That's very nice of you Chico....good way to start the week.
Uh huh. Yes, you keep saying this. You're not really fooling anyone, however. You most certainly DO care, so much so that you speculate that a poster must be some other past poster over and over again. .... And when someone dumps your lazy argument on it's ear, you most certainly DO try to verify it, then spin it... going round and round, and making sure you get the last word in.
Do you have a short-term memory problem, or do you just exist here in denial of your past behavior? You come off as one of the most affected (neurotic?) people here, and you don't block anyone. So the part about Harry doesn't wash either.
Whatever you do, please don't pretend that exposing untruth isn't a crucial aspect of debate. Just look at pf13's thread about Obama "giving $2 billion to Brazil."
We come here to debate the issues that affect people. Not hold hands and sing together. These are issues that DO shape opinions of the neutral majority who doesn't know any better. To be perpetually dishonest about those issues is a form of thought control. And that's NEVER benign.
Remember where Helen hung them, we may need them when we get back.
I don't know who Helen is, but please tell me she hung laundry or paintings or something.
Separate names with a comma.