Welcome to PatsFans.com

Leadership

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by patsfan13, Apr 6, 2011.

  1. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,175
    Likes Received:
    122
    Ratings:
    +308 / 9 / -12

    Ryan unveils his plan. Not a total solution a solid first step in fixing our economy. If this prevents our National Debt from going >100% of GDP (as Obama plan dictates) the economy will have a chance to grow.



    Paul Ryan: The GOP Path to Prosperity - WSJ.com



    Editorial: Ryan's Budget Plan Gets The Job Done - Investors.com

     
  2. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    42,294
    Likes Received:
    226
    Ratings:
    +523 / 14 / -28

    What Is Conservatism and What Is Wrong with It?

    The health insurance companies are all having multiple orgasms.. now they will "set up" some unsuspecting souls, aka the tea party, tell them some lies, sugarcoat the ryan plan, pour massive amounts into these unsuspecting nitwits and make a lot of noise...

    The reality is that old folks vote a lot and this could be the gift wrapped package that Obama was waiting for.. if you think that private insurers has anyone's best interest in mind except their bottom line, then you need serious medication..
     
  3. The Brandon Five

    The Brandon Five Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    6,710
    Likes Received:
    86
    Ratings:
    +280 / 6 / -4

    #75 Jersey

  4. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,175
    Likes Received:
    122
    Ratings:
    +308 / 9 / -12




    I agree Pelosi and Reid never introduced a budget last year. Obama has never proposed anything to deal with the structural debt the country faces. So they waited for someone to make the first move so they could demagogue, lie and have a campaign issue.

    This proposal will form the basis for the debate in the next election. Leadership vs cowardice.

    BTW for those interested a short course on the debt crisis:

    HERE IT IS: Your Short Course On Why The US Is Screwed
     
  5. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    42,294
    Likes Received:
    226
    Ratings:
    +523 / 14 / -28

    All this proposal does is continue the american plutocracy, and create more wealth for the private insurance companies.. the divide will continue to increase.

    How will this reconcile with the dreaded health care act? At first glance it appears to be somewhat dependent upon it??
     
  6. reflexblue

    reflexblue PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Messages:
    17,517
    Likes Received:
    71
    Ratings:
    +230 / 6 / -3

    #91 Jersey

    This is warmed over Reagonomics
     
  7. chicowalker

    chicowalker Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    13,246
    Likes Received:
    140
    Ratings:
    +297 / 3 / -4

    Looking forward to reading about this in the journal

    At first glance, disappointing that it doesn't appear to do much about military spending -- but maybe that was in order to curry favor with his fellow pubbies who won't take kindly to a lot of spending cuts and who would be particularly upset over military spending

    One good thing about this, regardless of the details, is that it should further focus discussions on decreasing government spending, which is a step toward decreasing overnment's overall size and reach.
     
  8. wistahpatsfan

    wistahpatsfan Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    15,675
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -1

    #75 Jersey

    I happen to like Ryan, but lately he seems to have made a deal with the Owners for the promise of the Big Job down the road. I don't like the idea of handing more profits to insurance companies. Not good. Senior votors still think the Republican Party represents "family values" and the Goode Olde Days of gays in the closet, Jesus and big band music. Wait til they find out that they're waterboys for their Owners.
     
  9. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    42,294
    Likes Received:
    226
    Ratings:
    +523 / 14 / -28

    Listening to a discussion of this on the radio today, there is no mention of scaling back the DOD, its contractors and prerequisite fraud.
     
  10. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    18,431
    Likes Received:
    227
    Ratings:
    +353 / 15 / -12

    A typical Republican proposal puts the onus of deficit reduction on the backs of those who our economy has failed to help under the unsubstantiated belief that trickle down economics works. Reagan created record deficits in order to pump enough money into our economy to create the illusion that the tax cuts were beneficial. His trickle down economics did not work. In fact, the separation between the rich and the middle class/poor only increased under his proposals.

    If we want to fix the deficit we need to raise taxes on the wealthy, get out of Afghanistan, and punish companies that abuse our markets by relocating to other nations. Ryan's proposal shows he has heartfelt love for money, but is stone cold for the needs of the needy.

    Personally, I think this survival of the fittest mentality is designed to protect white privilege as the country continues to advance towards whites being a minority.
     
  11. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,175
    Likes Received:
    122
    Ratings:
    +308 / 9 / -12

    From an article on the proposal:



    Here is a link to the entire propoals:

    The Roadmap Plan | A Roadmap for America's Future | The Budget Committee Republicans
     
  12. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    42,294
    Likes Received:
    226
    Ratings:
    +523 / 14 / -28

    House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan's 2012 proposal recommendation is disguised deliberate attempt by wealthy conservative political agendas to eliminate Medicare! RICH & WEALTHY political agenda to bring Medicare demise has been around ever since Medicare became law. Ryan pretends help by disguising this as a gift to America's senior and disabled Americans to buy time for republican conservatives to eliminate senior Americans & disable Americans services under Medicare---which is two thirds of'em---allowing "White House" to be conquered to enrich the rich and wealthy even more.

    It is an attempt, like "tax pledge" to sneak through a TROJAN HORSE as a gift for middle class that will be used to downsize federal government taking away Medicare services for American seniors and disabled Americans! Such strategy will continue to keep states struggling and downsizing! Sound familar?

    Why do we keep harping on the need for entitlement reform while continuing to hand out windfalls to the super rich and the Pentagon? Why do the poor "need to be reformed" but the rich don't?
     
  13. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,175
    Likes Received:
    122
    Ratings:
    +308 / 9 / -12

    Without reform medicare will go broke. The current spending is unsustainable.
     
  14. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    18,431
    Likes Received:
    227
    Ratings:
    +353 / 15 / -12

    Without tax increases, it is unsustainable. Bring back the death tax, which is largely a tax cut for the wealthy and restore tax rates to the good economic years of Kennedy when the top tax rate was around 70%, and we can take care of many of our problems, including getting those who are too poor to pay taxes to earn money with which to pay taxes. Fact is that since Reagan, the deficit has consistently grown under both Democrats (with the exception of Clinton) and Republicans. Reagan has laid the groundwork for the destruction of the United States, and Ryan continues the process with an even more reactionary approach.
     
  15. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    25,175
    Likes Received:
    122
    Ratings:
    +308 / 9 / -12


    This tax destroy family businesses like family farms, the income used to create the wealth to be passed down was already taxed. There is no justification for double taxing that wealth other than government greed. Better that wealth be given to family member to create more wealth.


    Looking to the past.......well if we get rid of all the entitlements enacted after Kennedy and give back the tax loopholes maybe you could get a deal.



    The status quo of the welfare state is what is reactionary these days. Socialist welfare states are in trouble around the world. The failed 'progressive' policies of the past don't work when you have gone from 14 workers per retiree to <3 workers per retiree. Game over Patters.
     
  16. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    18,431
    Likes Received:
    227
    Ratings:
    +353 / 15 / -12

    That point of view protects the landed elite, especially those families that inherited their wealth as a result of discrimination of the past, including the recent past. That said, I'm all for doing more to protect family farms, but by going after the agribusinesses which are the ones who have destroyed the family farms. .

    We should invest the money in workfare programs. I've had clients who have applied for as many as 60 jobs, but failed to get anything, in part because they have CORIs or they have the lack of social skills that is common among the mentally ill and cognitively impaired. There are tens of thousands of such people in the Boston area.

    Which of the countries with the low per capita deficits do you think we should emulate? How about Cuba?

    List of countries by external debt - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Russia also has fairly low debt:

    http://www.visualeconomics.com/gdp-vs-national-debt-by-country/
     
    Last edited: Apr 6, 2011
  17. chicowalker

    chicowalker Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    13,246
    Likes Received:
    140
    Ratings:
    +297 / 3 / -4

    right, family farms were destroyed by the estate tax...

    If you put a decent sized threshold ($10mm?) in place, there is virtually zero threat to any family businesses or family homes.


    Sure there is -- it's better to tax income of heirs who've done nothing but be born into the right family than to tax the income of hard-working people, rich or poor, who've actually generated the income for themselves.


    Any stats to support the contention that subsequent generations in families with sizable estates actually do that?
     
  18. chicowalker

    chicowalker Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    13,246
    Likes Received:
    140
    Ratings:
    +297 / 3 / -4

    while I agree with you about the estate tax, I totally disagree re. 70% tax rates -- it's confiscatory. Why should the government take $2 of every $3 from anybody?
     
  19. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    18,431
    Likes Received:
    227
    Ratings:
    +353 / 15 / -12

    It's a marginal tax rate, so it only kicks in after making a significant amount. It's been as high as 94%. I think under Ike, over $14 million in income generated that kind of tax, but of course the big loophole was that if you invested it, it would be taxed at a capital gains rate, thus stimulating investment.

    At any rate, my view of taxes is that they are a tool to address the economy. They are not something that should be fixed at a permanent number. Right now, we need to generate income to pay down the deficit. Raise taxes for a few years, and then lower them once the economy is doing better.
     
    Last edited: Apr 6, 2011
  20. chicowalker

    chicowalker Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    13,246
    Likes Received:
    140
    Ratings:
    +297 / 3 / -4

    Of course it's marginal -- that's not the point. and 94% is even more absurd.

    I'd agree with you about temporary increases (though 70%, 94%, etc. at any time just strike me as wrong), except that I don't trust politicians to keep temporary things temporary, especially when they generate revenue.
     

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>