Re: Lady Felger:"Pats Secondary Was Better When Mangini Was Coaching Them"
DBag's point is that from that 05 draft, only Sanders is playing for the team now with the others gone via trade, release, or injury...Felger acts as though he OWNS that point about the drafts being sh#tty because he harps on it non-stop...
No argument on 06 or 07, but what kind of argument is that for the 05 draft? I realize that's not your argument, but to evaluate a draft like that is stupid.
Despite starting for us from day 1 and playing at a Pro Bowl level for years, since Mankins holds out, it was a bad pick in that draft? And because Kaczur was a starting tackle for years and still capable of being a starter on our O-Line, but got injured this season, he was a bad pick? Cassel was a 7th rounder who saved our season in 2008 which we were able to convert into a 2nd rounder. That's tremendous value for a 7th rounder. The 2005 draft was one of the best ones under BB.
And my point here is simply that it's very, very, very easy for me or you or Felger or anyone to look back at decisions and decide what should have been done. That takes very little skill.
But to evaluate hundreds of players, assign them values, figure out how other teams value them, acquire them on draft day, picking one guy over another dozen similar guys...that is a real talent, a real skill. And everyone in the business makes mistakes.
Just because Felger points out that this decision failed and that pick sucked doesn't make him a talent evaluator, nor does it make his observations brilliant. After the fact, it's easy to see who worked out and who didn't. But if he (or I) were in charge of this team, there's no way we would do as well. Reviewing what happened vs. being in charge of making things happen are two entirely different things.