I dont accept the premise that since it wasn't viewed as important it isn't a big deal.
I hear you. But in that case, the league* is responsible to deal in a systematic way with what they consider some vital part of the game.
Is it important or not?
If so, why aren't there league-standard gauges? You have standard helmets, standard pads, standard balls... hell, you have standards for how you wear your socks.
But you never even tried to make sure the gauges are standard -- the rock on which NFL* competitiveness is founded, if we're to believe some of the press -- you're pretty much saying "this is only important if it's the Patriots."
Lets say on some page of the rule-book there's a paragraph that says that if a QB wears a wristband with plays printed on it the plays cannot be printed in a font size below 8. Let's say nobody cares or checks it. What do you think happens if a Clots D-Lineman says "that type looks too small?" Same thing. It's 7-point-gate, with the Pats claiming that it is an 8-point font with a low x-height.
Applying common sense: At some point a ball is too flat to throw well. At some point (for most) a ball is too over-inflated to get a grip. Everybody knows this. It's not "everybody wants a flat ball and only the Pats got one" in the first place. But that's how it's portrayed.
So you're right... if there's this grand conspiracy to cheat on this fantastically important rule, okay that's one thing. If there's a "pushing the edge" that got them busted on an unimportant rule, that's another. If there's no proof of either that's quite another -- and that's what we have here.
Again, psi may be meaningless but a planned, stealth, conspiratorial attempt to deceive the referees into not knowing you are playing with footballs that do not conform to the rules, is a serious crime, regardless of whether it created an advantage or not. Of course it didn't happen, but if it did, the Patriots would deserve what they have gotten.
Like I said, I feel you there, it's the "intent" thing that deserves the harsh penalty.
But first of all, we haven't even seen proof of
event never mind
intent. Secondly, do you hold that opinion on the point-size-on-wristbands example?
There's stickum, which changes the character of the game significantly. Then there's HGH and steroids. Then there's oh I dunno blood doping. Then there's 9 miles of insignificant ****, then there's this.