Welcome to PatsFans.com

King Refuses to Meet Prostitute

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by Mrs.PatsFanInVa, May 14, 2012.

  1. Mrs.PatsFanInVa

    Mrs.PatsFanInVa PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    15,797
    Likes Received:
    311
    Ratings:
    +516 / 9 / -3

    #24 Jersey

    How on earth do you conduct a thorough investigation when you refuse to interview the principal character?


    Peter King Refuses To Meet With Prostitute Involved In Secret Service Scandal
  2. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    41,421
    Likes Received:
    138
    Ratings:
    +265 / 10 / -26

    Between him and Issa all they do is hold hearings on anything remotely construed as anti Obama, King is barrel of laughs guy..
  3. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    24,753
    Likes Received:
    74
    Ratings:
    +161 / 7 / -13

    I don't believe anyone is disputing her involvement. What would she bring to the story?
  4. sdaniels7114

    sdaniels7114 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    5,742
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    Yeah, there would have to be something relevant for her to testify to. Just 'cause Hustler hasn't called her back yet doesn't mean the US government owes her some free publicity.
  5. Mrs.PatsFanInVa

    Mrs.PatsFanInVa PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    15,797
    Likes Received:
    311
    Ratings:
    +516 / 9 / -3

    #24 Jersey

    Oh, I don't know....maybe the other side of the story????

    These agents aren't the cream-of-the-crop poster boys for honesty, yanno? If you don't talk to the other people who were there how do you know they're telling the truth?

    For instance, they said there was never any danger of anyone finding "secrets." She's said differently. Wouldn't it be good to quiz her and find out what, if anything, she did have access to?
  6. scout

    scout Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    7,711
    Likes Received:
    27
    Ratings:
    +40 / 0 / -2

    #15 Jersey

    LMFAO! Judge, do you want to hear the prosecution's key witness? No, I think I have enough to go on, afterall, these individuals are employed by the federal government.
  7. Wolfpack

    Wolfpack Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    9,111
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Uh, gee, maybe by having the members of your committee or staff members be the ones who contact her directly and report back to you or, if she so chooses, contact her through her lawyer? (Which happens to be exactly what is happening).

    Just because he personally isn't meeting her doesn't mean she isn't getting the chance to tell her side of the story, so please feel free to stop running around like a chicken with its head cut off.

    Like the old saying goes, ask a stupid question.... :rofl:
    Last edited: May 14, 2012
  8. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    24,753
    Likes Received:
    74
    Ratings:
    +161 / 7 / -13


    The circumstances are clear a hooker was employed, she disputed the payment, and reported to the cops.

    What is being investigated is the structure of the agency that created an atmosphere with this lack of discipline. The sexual proclivities of the agents are secondary. The only thing she couls add would be to satisfy the purient interest of some.

    Who cares about the specifics of her beef the issue is the Secret Service culture that allowed this to happen at all. Unless we shoudfly all the Columbian hookers up fro a vacation in the US and perhaps deelop contacts for a reality show....
  9. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    41,421
    Likes Received:
    138
    Ratings:
    +265 / 10 / -26

    Drawing conclusions and making decisions on hearsay information is the preferred way of the right?? The guy told the other guy who told that other guy is the Constitutional way... :D:D:D:D
  10. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    24,753
    Likes Received:
    74
    Ratings:
    +161 / 7 / -13


    What exactly do you think she can add to the investigation?

    What is her contribution to government oversight.

    Specifics are welcome.
  11. PatsWSB47

    PatsWSB47 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    7,853
    Likes Received:
    84
    Ratings:
    +153 / 0 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    King prolly would have met with her if she went $50 bucks cheaper.


    Sorry, was there for the taking:p
  12. Mrs.PatsFanInVa

    Mrs.PatsFanInVa PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    15,797
    Likes Received:
    311
    Ratings:
    +516 / 9 / -3

    #24 Jersey

    How about the following?

    1) Would a "visitor" to the agent's room have access to the agent's belongings?

    2) Were visitors left unsupervised? Could they have, for instance, planted a bomb, while the agents were otherwise occupied?

    3) Would you have had access to their wallets, their IDs, their luggage, their personal information at any time? (For blackmail purposes)

    4) Were any photographs taken? Do you have any photographs in your possession?

    5) If visitors were left unsupervised ( or if the agents were asleep or passed out from drinking) were there any official documents in sight?

    6) Did you overhear any conversations of an official nature?

    7) Did you at any time have access to a room key or a way to copy the room key?

    8) Could you have made phone calls, perhaps to an accomplice if your purpose was not just prostitution but something of a terrorist nature?

    I think these are all pertinent questions - and I'd not trust the agents to answer them honestly.
  13. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    24,753
    Likes Received:
    74
    Ratings:
    +161 / 7 / -13



    So the hooker is going to evaluate the security procedures? :singing:


    The fact a hooker was in the room answers all those questions, since we assume the SS didn't do a background check on the hooker. :rolleyes:
  14. shmessy

    shmessy Maude Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    18,752
    Likes Received:
    349
    Ratings:
    +776 / 2 / -4

    #75 Jersey

    He's afraid she'll recognize him.
  15. Mrs.PatsFanInVa

    Mrs.PatsFanInVa PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    15,797
    Likes Received:
    311
    Ratings:
    +516 / 9 / -3

    #24 Jersey

    Who better at this point?
  16. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    24,753
    Likes Received:
    74
    Ratings:
    +161 / 7 / -13


    The fact she was there is the security problem. The question is where were the supervisors what did they know how did the agency police itself. If it happened here it is not a leap to think this wasn't an isolated incident that is the issue not this specific instance when they were caught.
  17. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    41,421
    Likes Received:
    138
    Ratings:
    +265 / 10 / -26

    You do not know, that is why you question her for direct testimony and not rely on hearsay...

    Has this happened before???

    If so with whom??

    Are Secret Service Men viewed as potential clients??

    What did you see in the room??

    Was the man you were with, appear to be drinking heavily??

    Did you notice any drugs or paraphenalia??
  18. PatriotsReign

    PatriotsReign On the Roster

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    26,509
    Likes Received:
    134
    Ratings:
    +343 / 3 / -13

    If the agents have already been fired for their behavior, that's enough punishment anyway. No need to prosecute the guys for any crimes. They've paid a price already.
  19. khayos

    khayos Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    3,675
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Wait... wait...

    Is MrsPatsFan saying that Congress, in its oversight of the executive branch, should follow the same procedures as an investigative law enforcement body and to not do so is a failure of its duties?

    Does she really want to open that door?

    LOL
    Last edited: May 15, 2012
  20. patsfan13

    patsfan13 Hall of Fame Poster PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    24,753
    Likes Received:
    74
    Ratings:
    +161 / 7 / -13


    The point isn't to punish those who have been fired. It is rather to find out why the management structure broke down ato the point where this sort of thing happened at all.

    That is what some of the law enforcement posters are unable to grasp.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>