...which now that I think about it is probably for the best. My money's on November 4th:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/peter_king/02/18/mmqb/1.html
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/peter_king/02/18/mmqb/1.html
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Week 1 isn't really as meaningful as both teams are trying to capture a rhythm and develop an identity.
November sounds about right.
Is this a home game? I forget the schedule.
...which now that I think about it is probably for the best. My money's on November 4th:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/peter_king/02/18/mmqb/1.html
I think the reason that the league WON'T open the season with the Pats at Indy, is the Pats will be coming back from China. It would be a lot, even for the NFL to ask the Pats to fly back from China and start the season early. The Pats are going to need all the time they can to recover from that kind of road trip. It would be a grear opener, but...
I think the reason that the league WON'T open the season with the Pats at Indy, is the Pats will be coming back from China. It would be a lot, even for the NFL to ask the Pats to fly back from China and start the season early. The Pats are going to need all the time they can to recover from that kind of road trip. It would be a grear opener, but...
Good point.
The parrotheads will be at Gillette on Sunday, Sept. 2 and Saturday, Sept. 8 - I don't think they'll have a game at the razor the day after.
While I agree that......
A.)why display a marquee matchup for the season opener when it will garner big ratings no matter what?
B.)it would not seem right to have big matchups in Week 1 that could decide playoff seedings when both teams are still finding their identities
BUT THAT HASN'T STOPPED THE NFL IN RECENT HISTORY note.......
2002 : Week 1: Steelers at Pats (rematch of the AFC Championship Game)
2003: Week 1: Bucs at Eagles (rematch of the NFC CHampionship Game)
2004: Week 1: Colts at Pats (rematch of the AFC Championship Game)
2005: Week 1: Eagles at Falcons (rematch of the NFC Championship Game)
2006: Week 1: Colts at Giants (Manning Bowl, would have gotten ratings regardless of place in the schedule)
so you can see that the NFL has never shied away from the marquee or 'sexy' matchups in the first week of the season
I think the reason that the league WON'T open the season with the Pats at Indy, is the Pats will be coming back from China. It would be a lot, even for the NFL to ask the Pats to fly back from China and start the season early. The Pats are going to need all the time they can to recover from that kind of road trip. It would be a grear opener, but...
This is the same league that sent the Pats to Carolina, Pittsburgh, Atlanta and Denver in the span of 5 weeks. The same league that re-emphasized rules to neutralize the Pats' style of play.
It wouldn't surprise me one bit if it happened.
Two, the league is already pissing off Bill Belichick by putting the China game (New England vs. Seattle in Beijing, Aug. 8) halfway around the world in the middle of training camp. The Pats likely won't be fed to the lions (or Colts) in this made-for-Indy game.
Why didn't they take two West Coast teams? That would piss me off too if I were Pats management. I watched a little of the 49ers - Cardinals exhibition game from Mexico City last year, or was it the year before, and to tell you the truth, you could tell almost none of the fans knew WTF was going on. And that was a neighboring country! I can understand investigating going international with the NFL, but China?
You think so? I used to go to Japan on business and it left me f'd up for a few days, on both sides of the pond. Kraft would know that kind of thing happens and I'd hope he wouldn't push for such a trip. But, whatever.I'd have to think Kraft actually wanted to go, for the publicity overseas.
Big difference here, this would be a Thursday game, the games you list for 05 and 06 were not Thursday games. This game would have to be a Thursday game as the Super Bowl Champion gets the honor of opening on Thursday night.
After the Colts complained about playing in Foxboro in week 1 of 2004, essentially ending the race for HFA in week 1, the NFL more or less said that they would not aim for a game that prior to the season looks as if it could go a long way in determining HFA. Hence you get the Pats-Raiders in 05 and Steelers-Phins in 06.
The Pats could still have a marquee match up in week 1, it just won't be the Colts. They could play on MNF or Sunday Night. There are plenty of big games they could play (Cincy, Baltimore, SD, Philly, etc).