BelichickFan said:"
OK, he's not exactly in his prime but he and Belichick supposedly have a good releationship..
About 2 years ago KJ was asked what one QB would he love to catch for....he said Tom Brady.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.BelichickFan said:"
OK, he's not exactly in his prime but he and Belichick supposedly have a good releationship..
Beavis said:About 2 years ago KJ was asked what one QB would he love to catch for....he said Tom Brady.
shmessy said:I can't stand "Keyshawn types" and I find myself almost holding my nose writing this, but I think this might actually be a good option for the Pats.
nickw308810 said:I like Keyshawn, but lets not get carried away here. First off, he couldn't out run Vince Wilfork. The guy is slow. I have also seen him make some key drops in games. We wouldn't be getting 1st overall pick Keyshawn Johnson. We would be getting a decent possession WR who is a good blocker. Could he help our team? Sure, but he isn't close to an upgrade over David Givens.
nickw308810 said:I like Keyshawn, but lets not get carried away here. First off, he couldn't out run Vince Wilfork.
R_T26 said:I know, im just a little concerned w/ the WR position. Have you seen whats available? Plus if bRANCH GOES DOWN YIKES.
Not to mention David Payton, who didn't turn out to be a dreg but certainly didn't excite anyone when he was signed.DaBruinz said:Yes, I have seen what is available and there is still some pretty good talent out there. Definitely better than the dregs the Pats had to settle for in 2001. You know. Torrence Small, Bert Emanuel, Fred Coleman, and Charles Johnson.