PonyExpress
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2006
- Messages
- 4,659
- Reaction score
- 78
For real. Here's the link: http://www.ktul.com/news/stories/0506/327946.html
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Julius said:This may explain why the Pats didn't try to keep him.
GJAJ15 said:Wonder what constitutes, "injuring a public building", guess the Dolphins are having their share of problems with drug users...
Hoodie said:Ok, I know this probably only bothers me but I don't think you can injure an inanimate object. How about charging him with "destruction of public property?"
Hoodie said:Ok, I know this probably only bothers me but I don't think you can injure an inanimate object.
Hoodie said:Ok, I know this probably only bothers me but I don't think you can injure an inanimate object. How about charging him with "destruction of public property?"
Tunescribe said:The answer will come when they decide whether to place the building on IR.
edzo44 said:They would only do that if they have damaged the building's self-esteem!
Tunescribe said:Hopefully it doesn't have an edifice complex!
Welker83 said:http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2447181&CMP=OTC-DT9705204233
DUI and they found XANAX on him without a perscription... He also ripped a smoke detector off a federal building...
Same thing, except it's a special charge for vandalism to a public building. Sort of how assaulting a police officer carries a greater charge than assaulting a citizen.Hoodie said:how about charging him with vandalism?