- Joined
- Feb 10, 2005
- Messages
- 33,091
- Reaction score
- 22,701
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I'd like to find out if Neal is a weaker link than we suspect. Problem it, I think we have two solid LT's, so what do you do with the spare?
I'd take Nick over Stephen for a handful of snaps to diagnose a problem, personally. I'm not hating on Neal, I just think some of you over-value him and have not carefully observed Kaczur.
5.) The line will be Light/Mankins/Koppen/Neal/Kaczur, if Nick is healthy. If not, they'll go with the backup at RT. Matt Cassel will finally be able to spend all day behind the line the way Brady did last season. The difference being, of course, that nobody called Brady out for doing it, but every time Cassel does it people will act as if MC just shot their dog.
I don't get this. The only difference in the line Cassel has been behind is Neal, whose strength is run blocking, not pass blocking. There are two variables involved:
1) Brady has a better pocket presence than any other QB in the league save for a few other elites. Matt Cassel does not share this talent.
2) Teams are rushing us much differently.
When Brady was spending "all day" behind this line, its b/c teams were afraid to rush and dropping guys in coverage - teams were rushing 3 or 4 max. The Giants showed the line is vulnerable up the middle.
1.) I think you're underestimating Neal's pass blocking here.
2.) The Giants weren't really overpowering the line until Neal went out.
3.) One thing that should change with Neal back is that Koppen and company won't have to cheat the line in order to protect Yates.
4.) Teams often blitzed the Patriots. Brady just killed them when they did. The line picking up the blitz helped with that.
I don't expect Cassel to be able to serve tea behind the line, but he should get more time now, and that should make a big difference.
1.) I think you're underestimating Neal's pass blocking here.
2.) The Giants weren't really overpowering the line until Neal went out.
3.) One thing that should change with Neal back is that Koppen and company won't have to cheat the line in order to protect Yates.
4.) Teams often blitzed the Patriots. Brady just killed them when they did. The line picking up the blitz helped with that.
I don't expect Cassel to be able to serve tea behind the line, but he should get more time now, and that should make a big difference.
Some good points, I agree with #2 for sure, and then I guess 1&3 to some extent by extension. But I still think the phrasing was peculiar and sold Brady's influence on the line a little short.
1.) We've seen the line without Neal for 6 weeks. I think we've seen enough.
2.) Neal is the team's best pulling run blocker. He's also the most athletic O-lineman the team has. Without him, the O-line got buried in the Super Bowl, and has been sub par ever since. He's got LoMo's injury luck, but he's a quality player when healty.
3.) <sigh> Ryan Clady would look great at RT this season.
4.) Here's hoping Oher somehow falls all the way to the Patriots in the first round!
5.) The line will be Light/Mankins/Koppen/Neal/Kaczur, if Nick is healthy. If not, they'll go with the backup at RT. Matt Cassel will finally be able to spend all day behind the line the way Brady did last season. The difference being, of course, that nobody called Brady out for doing it, but every time Cassel does it people will act as if MC just shot their dog.
True but Mayo looks just fine to me at ILB
Evidently Nick's back in practice.
I'd like to see him at RG, personally. Would anyone hate to try that out?
Light, Mankins, Koppen, Kaczur, LeVoir
Now some of you know more about natural positions than I do (maybe all of you). How would you situate the starting O-Line based on all the available personnel?