Welcome to PatsFans.com

Justin Houston vs Brooks Reed

Discussion in 'Patriots Draft Talk' started by KDPPatsfan85, Apr 29, 2011.

?

At #33, would you take Reed or Houston?

  1. Brooks Reed

    78.8%
  2. Justin Houston

    21.2%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. KDPPatsfan85

    KDPPatsfan85 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Messages:
    2,466
    Likes Received:
    54
    Ratings:
    +114 / 1 / -8

    #51 Jersey

    If you had to pick one at #33, who would you choose and Why??
  2. patchick

    patchick Moderatrix Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    11,738
    Likes Received:
    367
    Ratings:
    +971 / 9 / -2

    #11 Jersey

    Those are my only options? :( Reed by default, I don't see Houston as a fit.
  3. sbpatfan

    sbpatfan Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,930
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Brooks Reed because I think his long blonde hair has a great chance of transitioning to dreads in the NFL. Not many teams have a blonde predator.
  4. serifyn

    serifyn Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Messages:
    718
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    Justin Houston is projected to slip because he tested positive for Marijuana. the patriots might be able to get him in the 3rd round after slipping like Hernandez did last year.

    Go Reefer!
  5. dryheat44

    dryheat44 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,369
    Likes Received:
    33
    Ratings:
    +78 / 2 / -0

    #75 Jersey

    I see Reed as hopelessly one-dimensional. I see Houston as currently one-dimensional, but with a better chance to improve into a multi-tool player with time and coaching. Since I think that Houston is better at the one-dimension they both can currently do, I see no argument for Reed if we're considering them for the same draft slot.

    That being said, I think they're both reaches before #60. I think Reed is a reach even there.
    Last edited: Apr 29, 2011
  6. Real World

    Real World Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Messages:
    27,003
    Likes Received:
    191
    Ratings:
    +443 / 5 / -2

    How about "C", none of the above. From everything I'm reading on these two guys, they're either going to be boom or bust types. Lots of scouts seem to think the latter. That Reed is too one dimensional. I read stuff like explosive first step in some write-ups, and Vernon Gholston one trick pony in the rest. Man, is Bowers' knee really that bad? Such a shame if it is.
  7. silenthuntr7

    silenthuntr7 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    Messages:
    206
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Like dryheat said, I don't want either at 33. But Houston has the better measurables (indeed elite measurables), is more explosive, and thus (in my eyes) has better potential, say at 60 or with the first 3rd.

    Then again, the Patriots may prefer someone like Sheard or Bailey over both, so we'll see. It's always an interesting draft with BB and co.
  8. VJCPatriot

    VJCPatriot Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Messages:
    12,369
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +52 / 1 / -4

    Reed is the better prospect and doesn't have the character issues. Houston failed a drug test. No thanks. I don' t think the Pats will take Reed at #33. They will trade down first. But any time after pick 40 I think is a good time to pick an OLB conversion. Jabaal Sheard is another guy to keep an eye out for but Houston is OFF my draft board.
  9. Urgent

    Urgent Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Messages:
    2,009
    Likes Received:
    37
    Ratings:
    +122 / 1 / -0

    #24 Jersey

    Justin Houston played OLB in a 3-4. Reed played straight hand-down rush ahead DE.
    Justin Houston had 10 sacks last season. Reed had 6.5.

    I think Houston has a little more versatility and productivity.

    The marijuna? Stupid, probably. But if that equals bad character, I know a lot of bad characters. Historically, marijuana has not correlated highly with poor performance. Warren Sapp, Aaron Hernandez, etc.

    If you pass on these two, another big drop. Back to the Ninkovitch's.
  10. VJCPatriot

    VJCPatriot Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Messages:
    12,369
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +52 / 1 / -4

    The only problems with this analysis are:
    1. College productivity has little or no bearing on pro producitvity - see Matthews putting up only OK stats in college and turning into a monster at the next level.
    2. Linebackers who play standing up have little bearing to whether they convert well to the Pats system. See Bruschi/Vrabel who were both defensive ends and only played linear style at the college level turning into two of the finest defenders in the Pats system.
    Last edited: Apr 29, 2011
  11. bucky

    bucky Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,717
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    It's funny you say that because I see Houston as a guy who completely doesn't hustle on the football field. So I have serious doubts about his ability to improve at the next level.

    Personally, I would take either Sheard or Ayers above either of these 2 guys. But if I had to chose from the 2, I'd take Reed.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>