Welcome to PatsFans.com

Jetsies could still make playoffs

Discussion in 'NFL Football Forum' started by SanAngeloState, Dec 4, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Triumph

    Triumph Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    6,353
    Likes Received:
    75
    Ratings:
    +166 / 35 / -13

    #32 Jersey

    lol...........
  2. Triumph

    Triumph Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    6,353
    Likes Received:
    75
    Ratings:
    +166 / 35 / -13

    #32 Jersey

    Yup, they will lose to the Giants and then Miami will put the final nail in the coffin. A perfect ending.

    No backing in the playoffs this year for Fatso and his boys.
  3. SEA_Pat

    SEA_Pat Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Messages:
    432
    Likes Received:
    9
    Ratings:
    +14 / 0 / -1

    I'm sorry, but I fail to see the logic. According to your well established thesis they have an awful defense, and will not be able to win a playoff game as a result. Therefore, they can't possibly choke from your point of view, they can only overachieve. Please be consistent, you can't have your cake and eat it too.
  4. PatsFanSince74

    PatsFanSince74 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Messages:
    9,942
    Likes Received:
    46
    Ratings:
    +89 / 1 / -1

    I think your math's wrong re BAL vs. NYP for the Conference tiebreaker.

    Both the Pats (BUF and PIT) and Ravens (JAK and TEN) already have two conference losses.

    All of Baltimore's remaining opponents are AFC teams (IND, SD, CLE, CIN); so, if "they go 3--1," that would give them a 12--4 record with three conference losses.

    The Pats face three AFC teams (DEN, MIA, BUF) and one NFC team (WAS). So, if the Pats end up "dropping one of these last four," it would depend on where the loss was. Were they to lose to the 'skins and run the table against the AFC teams, they would end up 12--4, but with only two conference losses they would own the tiebreaker; if the loss came against an AFC team (in this case the Broncos in Denver, because I'd bet the farm that they won't lose at home to either BUF or MIA), they would be tied with Baltimore for this tiebreaker.

    The next tiebreaker would be "Best Win-Lost-Tie percentage in common games, minimum of four," which Baltimore would win if they defeat both IND and SDC down the stretch (they would be 5--0 vs. PIT, NYJ, PIT, IND, SD) and the Pats would be 4--1 against the same four teams). If a 12--4 Ravens team had one of its remaining losses against either IND or SD, they would go to the next tiebreaker, SOV, which I just don't have time to calculate at this point.

    The one scenario you don't consider is Houston running the table, beating CIN, CAR, IND and TEN and ending up 13--3. But my head already hurts and I can't spend any more time on this.

    The bottom line is what I always say at this time of year when we all start these silly assessments more than a week or two from the end of the season. "Win this week. Then worry about the next game and let the stuff we can't control take care of itself."
    Last edited: Dec 5, 2011
  5. SanAngeloState

    SanAngeloState Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,289
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Well, they could win against the Jets, who aren't very good. That is probably the only team they could beat. Maybe the Texans and 50/50 on the Raiders. But they're only an almost sure thing against the Jets. I say almost, because there's always the choke factor.
  6. Joker

    Joker PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2004
    Messages:
    16,819
    Likes Received:
    443
    Ratings:
    +1,050 / 15 / -16


    the Pats already beat the Raiders....IN Oakland...31-19....what else you got?...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>