- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 37,541
- Reaction score
- 16,315
We will spend years analyze the 2009 draft, as we have others.
What you seem to fail to understand is that it would have been very reasonable to draft Butler at 23 and Vollmer at 34. Vollmer would have been viewed as a reach, but he certainly turned out to be worth that level of pick, and after all, we need a LT. Belichick could have chosen not to move down, but Butler was a very, very high priority. I believe more draftnicks has the patriots drafting him in the first than any other player.
So, in the end, the patriots had two targets at what the patriots perceived at top needs.
There can be criticism that he risked losing these players by trading down. However, I cannot understand those who criticize the results. The additional need that Belichick had was to find a backup SS. I don't see how Belichick could have done much better in meeting what he perceived as the key needs of the team.
What Belichcik gained for ZERO cost (since he would have drafted the same players) was Brace, T8ate and 2010 second round choice. Maybe all of these will turn out to be worthless. Instead of Brace, perhaps we have traded our top three picks to pick the #1 NT in the 2009 draft. Somehow, I think we ended up better.
So, for me, I will always whine about not getting a linebacker high in the draft. I do so every year. Someday I wil understand that Bleichick does not judge that value at OLB is found in the first two rounds of the draft. Not all needs must be met through the draft, after all.
Whiners like you can criticize what almost all writers judged as a B+ or better draft at the time and in retrospect. That is your right and priviledge.
What you seem to fail to understand is that it would have been very reasonable to draft Butler at 23 and Vollmer at 34. Vollmer would have been viewed as a reach, but he certainly turned out to be worth that level of pick, and after all, we need a LT. Belichick could have chosen not to move down, but Butler was a very, very high priority. I believe more draftnicks has the patriots drafting him in the first than any other player.
So, in the end, the patriots had two targets at what the patriots perceived at top needs.
There can be criticism that he risked losing these players by trading down. However, I cannot understand those who criticize the results. The additional need that Belichick had was to find a backup SS. I don't see how Belichick could have done much better in meeting what he perceived as the key needs of the team.
What Belichcik gained for ZERO cost (since he would have drafted the same players) was Brace, T8ate and 2010 second round choice. Maybe all of these will turn out to be worthless. Instead of Brace, perhaps we have traded our top three picks to pick the #1 NT in the 2009 draft. Somehow, I think we ended up better.
So, for me, I will always whine about not getting a linebacker high in the draft. I do so every year. Someday I wil understand that Bleichick does not judge that value at OLB is found in the first two rounds of the draft. Not all needs must be met through the draft, after all.
Whiners like you can criticize what almost all writers judged as a B+ or better draft at the time and in retrospect. That is your right and priviledge.
Mayo didn't look much like a DROY this year and Oher is better than Vollmer.
Belichick had the opportunity to stock this roster with elite talent and he passed a lot of it up by trading down, THAT'S SIMPLY A FACT, go look up the players he's passed up on trying to prove he's a genius. Possibly hitting on 2 players with all the picks they've had is a pretty sad average but again, sit back, relax and drink another tall glass of the kool-aid.
Brday is not playing till he's 40, sorry. 3 more years tops.