Crazyeechrispats1
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2007
- Messages
- 993
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Actually, I think McGinest has intimated that he has some bad blood about leaving. He has taken the high road publically and praised Belichick and the Pats. But I got the sense that he was not happy he wasn't given the opportunity to retire a Patriot. Granted I could have read into the situation wrong.
One guy I did forget who seems to have said negative things about the Patriots off the record (at least in terms of his own situation) was Adam Vinatieri.
I remember something with Seau getting #55 when he became a Patriot. I think Willy was expecting the #55 to be retired.
LoL, channel 7 just reported this as new news??? I guess it all new again. I am shocked. I guess we should be punished again...and again...and again...and again... and again...
I hate the media!
"NEW CHEATING CHARGES" ARE OLD NEWS
The item to which the Drudge Report has or will be linking is a New York Times article that traces the Patriots' practice of videotaping defensive coaching signals back to the 2000 preseason.
But this really isn't "new." It has been established that Pats coach Bill Belichick began the practice when he joined the team in 2000. Belichick contends that he interpreted the rules to permit the practice.
So that's it. Those are the "new cheating charges."
We don't fault the guys who wrote the article, John Branch and Greg Bishop. Instead, the false impression created by the headline was created by whoever wrote the headline. As we've learned over the years, that person rarely is the person who wrote the story.
The Times article also contains some interesting quotes harvested on Thursday in Indianapolis. For example, former Rams coach Mike Martz said that he wants the league to continue to investigate whether the Patriots taped his team's walk-through practice prior to Super Bowl XXXVI, and Martz took issue with the notion that having such information wouldn't be useful.
"For somebody to say that, it's kind of disgusting," Martz said. "The whole point is if they really cheated. To say he took some steroids and it did help or it didn't help, that’s never the point. The point is, to all these high school coaches and high school kids and college kids, that if they did cheat, that’s the point."
LoL, channel 7 just reported this as new news??? I guess it all new again. I am shocked. I guess we should be punished again...and again...and again...and again... and again...
I hate the media!
LoL, channel 7 just reported this as new news??? I guess it all new again. I am shocked. I guess we should be punished again...and again...and again...and again... and again...
I hate the media!
Really? There's nothing new here? Maybe there's no new evidence but a hell of a lot of new info, unless you guys have some better source than me.
I don't remember seeing the competition committee quotes before. Where were they previously published?
I don't follow spygate that closely, but was that summed up before by members of the comp. committee, that
"We all have different opinions but we're all satisfied w/the investigation?"
How about the former patriots player "quoted" (although he's not named - a surefire cred issue for me)? Did we cover a former player from 2000 saying he knew firsthand about taping from that season?
I mean, are you guys just way more dialed in than me on spygate, or isn't this stuff I haven't previously seen?
It looks to me that they took the get-together opportunity of the Combine to meet on this issue, which puts all these guys in town at one time. That generates the interview opportunities. So now there's the opportunity to put out the "sense of the league" through a variety of mouthpieces.
It looks like the concensus seems to be:
"We're satisfied with the investigation and the fine. Go away Specter. But we're not taking a group hit for what we're calling the sins of one team."
Sounds like there's new info here to me.
PFnV
NY Times also doing a hatchet job today on John McCain. If it was on Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, the story would never see the light of day.
Shouldn't the title of this story be:
"New Claim of Taping Emerges Against Patriots Eventhough It Really Is A Rehash of the Same Claims Already Known, But This Article Will Get More Exposure If We Use A Sensational And Misleading Title"
Didn't we already know that Belichick admitted to taping since his became head coach in 2000. So exactly how new is the claim by a former player who reitterated what we already know?
POSTED 10:32 p.m. EST, February 21, 2008
"NEW CHEATING CHARGES" ARE OLD NEWS
The item to which the Drudge Report has or will be linking is a New York Times article that traces the Patriots' practice of videotaping defensive coaching signals back to the 2000 preseason.
But this really isn't "new." It has been established that Pats coach Bill Belichick began the practice when he joined the team in 2000. Belichick contends that he interpreted the rules to permit the practice.
So that's it. Those are the "new cheating charges."
We don't fault the guys who wrote the article, John Branch and Greg Bishop. Instead, the false impression created by the headline was created by whoever wrote the headline. As we've learned over the years, that person rarely is the person who wrote the story.
The Times article also contains some interesting quotes harvested on Thursday in Indianapolis. For example, former Rams coach Mike Martz said that he wants the league to continue to investigate whether the Patriots taped his team's walk-through practice prior to Super Bowl XXXVI, and Martz took issue with the notion that having such information wouldn't be useful.
"For somebody to say that, it's kind of disgusting," Martz said. "The whole point is if they really cheated. To say he took some steroids and it did help or it didn't help, that’s never the point. The point is, to all these high school coaches and high school kids and college kids, that if they did cheat, that’s the point."
Really? There's nothing new here? ...
Sounds like there's new info here to me.
PFnV
go to hell, noob. BigglesWorth has a point. There are at least 5 spygate threads started per day, here, and, more often than not, none of them have anything new to contribute to the matter (like this one). We're all sick of it.
“We were all satisfied, every one of us,” said John Mara, the Giants’ president. “All of us have our different opinions about the Patriots, but we were all satisfied that this thing was investigated properly and that they came to the proper conclusion.”
Huh??? A NEW claim?? Sorry that doesn't make any sense.. new details OLD claim...what is new in anything he said other than he made them?? Joe Scmo said he say the burglary at Watergate in 72...new claim?? I don't think so...The y2k ex-Patriot is, as we all seem to agree, new.
This makes his claim that the Pats were taping a new claim.
I remember something with Seau getting #55 when he became a Patriot. I think Willy was expecting the #55 to be retired.