Welcome to PatsFans.com

Is a Haliburton Subsidiary responsible for the Probs at Walter Reed...

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by DarrylS, Mar 4, 2007.

  1. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    41,785
    Likes Received:
    180
    Ratings:
    +364 / 11 / -27

    From the Army Times, not sure if IAP is a subsidiary or a spin off by a former boss of Haliburton, but without regard looks like this company may bear some responsibility. Never understood why we would want to privatize our most basic services and just spin them out with no oversight. I know it is about money, but there seems to be trend since our involvement in Iraq to just give out big bucks with no oversight or accountability by the US gov't.

    http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/03/Weightmansubpoena/

    Committee Chairman Henry Waxman and subcommittee Chairman John Tierney asked Weightman to testify about an internal memo that showed privatization of services at Walter Reed could put “patient care services… at risk of mission failure.”

    But Army officials refused to allow Weightman to appear before the committee after he was relieved of command.

    “The Army was unable to provide a satisfactory explanation for the decision to prevent General Weightman from testifying,” committee members said in a statement today.

    The committee wants to learn more about a letter written in September by Garrison Commander Peter Garibaldi to Weightman.

    The memorandum “describes how the Army’s decision to privatize support services at Walter Reed Army Medical Center was causing an exodus of ‘highly skilled and experienced personnel,’” the committee’s letter states. “According to multiple sources, the decision to privatize support services at Walter Reed led to a precipitous drop in support personnel at Walter Reed.”

    The letter said Walter Reed also awarded a five-year, $120-million contract to IAP Worldwide Services, which is run by Al Neffgen, a former senior Halliburton official.

    They also found that more than 300 federal employees providing facilities management services at Walter Reed had drooped to fewer than 60 by Feb. 3, 2007, the day before IAP took over facilities management. IAP replaced the remaining 60 employees with only 50 private workers.

    “The conditions that have been described at Walter Reed are disgraceful,” the letter states. “Part of our mission on the Oversight Committee is to investigate what led to the breakdown in services. It would be reprehensible if the deplorable conditions were caused or aggravated by an ideological commitment to privatize government services regardless of the costs to taxpayers and the consequences for wounded soldiers.”

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>