- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 37,571
- Reaction score
- 16,341
15 has been enough in the past (often 6 DL's and 9 LB's). I think that even with more 4-3, we could still keep the same number.
DL (7) Seymour, Wilfork, Warren, Wright, Brace, Green, Pryor/Smith
OLB/DE (2) Burgess, Banta-Cain
OLB (3) Thomas, Woods, Crable
ILB (3) Mayo, Guyton, Bruschi
A 16th is certainly possible, perhaps reasonable. Lenon and Ninkovitch come to mind.
9 DB's seems to be sufficient with McGowan competing with Tank and special teamers for the 9th DB roster spot.
DL (7) Seymour, Wilfork, Warren, Wright, Brace, Green, Pryor/Smith
OLB/DE (2) Burgess, Banta-Cain
OLB (3) Thomas, Woods, Crable
ILB (3) Mayo, Guyton, Bruschi
A 16th is certainly possible, perhaps reasonable. Lenon and Ninkovitch come to mind.
9 DB's seems to be sufficient with McGowan competing with Tank and special teamers for the 9th DB roster spot.