Welcome to PatsFans.com

Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Slams Liberals

Discussion in 'Political Discussion' started by IcyPatriot, Sep 6, 2006.

  1. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    39,724
    Likes Received:
    566
    Ratings:
    +1,378 / 34 / -28

    #87 Jersey

    I keep telling you liberals it is you they despise...it is you our country protects...you didn't believe me...so here it is:

    http://www.irna.ir/en/news/view/line-24/0609078913005904.htm

    Liberalism is good for care of the needy and hedging the rich & powerfull who use people...that's where it should end. All we need to do then is get rid of some liberal politicians and replace them with moderates and the boys can come home.

    How many did you say?
     
  2. wistahpatsfan

    wistahpatsfan Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    15,675
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -1

    #75 Jersey

    WTF, F.B.N.
    You can't quote youself and attribute it to a terrorist ex-president of Iran.
    It would confuse all the kids in the class.
     
  3. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    39,724
    Likes Received:
    566
    Ratings:
    +1,378 / 34 / -28

    #87 Jersey

    You did that...I banish you to being a Jets fan this weekend as punishment.
     
  4. Harry Boy

    Harry Boy Look Up, It's Amazing PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    40,696
    Likes Received:
    224
    Ratings:
    +829 / 2 / -9

    Doesn't that greasy little bastard know that the liberals are on his side?
     
  5. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    39,724
    Likes Received:
    566
    Ratings:
    +1,378 / 34 / -28

    #87 Jersey

    As usual, no answers...because you..yes you keep them there...America has 2 enemies....the terrorists and their liberal buddies...both trying to defeat Bush at the same time.

    HAS ANY PRESIDENT EVER HAD TO DEFEAT 2 ENEMIES AT ONCE?
    PRESIDENT BUSH..PERSECUTED OVER THE SCORN OF SOME HEAD!!!
     
  6. wistahpatsfan

    wistahpatsfan Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    15,675
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -1

    #75 Jersey

    You can't do that, either! :eek:
     
  7. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    42,300
    Likes Received:
    228
    Ratings:
    +527 / 14 / -28

    The enemies are not the liberals, this is what they want you to believe, however nothing is further from the truth... the liberals provide balance and asks questions that are not allowed in the White House of in the GOP party. I am sure if the same thing could be said of Clinton when he was trying to fight terror, and the GOP was trying to impeach him for a BJ?? I know they tried for something else, but it started with a BJ.
     
  8. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    39,724
    Likes Received:
    566
    Ratings:
    +1,378 / 34 / -28

    #87 Jersey

    Asking questions is very American and a good thing. These people (read NEM's posts) are actively attacking our President in the media which helps the recruitment and hate on America.

    There are differences between the 2. But a reasonable person would know the difference between the two and many do. Like they say Bush had a vendetta against Saddam so to do they have a vendetta against Bush from the Clinton years.

    You aren't in this group...you don't think like that. But they do and they could care less. They will use any small bit of info to attack Bush and furthur weaken our countries figh against terrorism.

    If the next President is a democrat...and follows Bush's plan to a "T"...do you think they will attack in kind? IMO they will not and it will prove how right we were about them all along. Their plan is simple and viscious. Bush is weakened by an unpopular war...so if they furthur weaken him perhaps they can be rid of him before 2008.
     
  9. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    18,462
    Likes Received:
    229
    Ratings:
    +360 / 15 / -12

    F.B.N., you are so off target with your reasoning. You are simply overlooking the fact that it's reasonable to believe Bush's approach to the WOT is making things worse. That's the issue here. In the view of many, Bush's approach is counterproductive and dangerous to American interests.
     
  10. Harry Boy

    Harry Boy Look Up, It's Amazing PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    40,696
    Likes Received:
    224
    Ratings:
    +829 / 2 / -9

    An American Soldier was attacked in Seattle Washington this week for wearing his uniform in public and for addmitting that he served in Iraq, they called him a "baby killer" as they beat him.

    The Jane Fonda/John Kerry MOTHER F-UCKERS are back, thanks to the sore losing bastard democrats, I wonder how that hog Murtha feels when he reads of this.
     
  11. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    39,724
    Likes Received:
    566
    Ratings:
    +1,378 / 34 / -28

    #87 Jersey

    Today or tomorrow Iraq takes control of their military...things can only go so fast...but there is progress everyday and that should make americans feel a bit better knowing the end is closer.

    When the last man leaves then I say do what you will to Bush...he will be out of office by then...for now...press on as long as there is progress.
     
  12. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    18,462
    Likes Received:
    229
    Ratings:
    +360 / 15 / -12

    That's where we disagree. There is not progress. The Iraqi government doesn't even control Baghdad; there are scores of attacks regularly; hundreds of Iraqis are still dying on a regular basis; Iraq is no longer keeping Iran in check and is likely to align with them; the Arab world is more angry at us than they've been in many years; and the terrorists are using the war to recruit, to kill American troops, and to develop their tactics.

    There is no progress in Iraq, and many troops, Republicans, conservatives, and independent groups have said as much. I don't know where your getting your information? From Bush? Convince us that the progress is greater that the regress.
     
  13. IcyPatriot

    IcyPatriot ------------- PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    39,724
    Likes Received:
    566
    Ratings:
    +1,378 / 34 / -28

    #87 Jersey

    This is forwards...I made sure to get it from a liberal rag.
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1867445,00.html
     
  14. Patters

    Patters Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    18,462
    Likes Received:
    229
    Ratings:
    +360 / 15 / -12

  15. wistahpatsfan

    wistahpatsfan Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2005
    Messages:
    15,675
    Likes Received:
    11
    Ratings:
    +13 / 0 / -1

    #75 Jersey

    What military are you talking about? What specific progress are you referring to? In order to have progress, Iraq must get at least to where they were before we demolished it. That's where the progress starts.
     

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>