I think there is a disincentive for the Pats to sue the Herald, even if they have enough evidence that the Herald had malicious intent in posting the story about the taping of the Rams practice. They obviously want this story to be put to rest. And of course we are all boycotting the herald. However, I think if we could go one step further and boycott their advertisers and advertisers started to withdraw their finances from the Herald, it would have just as big an impact. What do you guys think?