Welcome to PatsFans.com

If the game was played 9 more times?

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by teamplay, Jan 22, 2007.

  1. teamplay

    teamplay Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    160
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I'm reading all the post-game threads and this question surfaces: If this game was played 9 more times under identical circumstances (dome, flu, etc.), how many W's do the Pats take home?

    Think before you answer...

    I say the Pats would win 3 or 4 out of 10. We were just a few frustrating plays away last night, but these teams are both great. One key point about each team:

    Pats: a lot of patchwork this season...expertly managed...but against an excellent team, those things get exposed.

    Colts: The O matured, as someone said. But the BIG change was that Dungy finally got his small, fast D playing like the Tampa Bay team. I thought they'd get exploited in the playoffs. That they didn't is a scary thought for the future.

    Bottom line: the Colts at the end of the season are a more complete and balanced team. The Pats has some holes to fill this off-season. My hats off to both teams.
  2. richpats

    richpats Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2005
    Messages:
    3,499
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    I say none. The Pats would have never gone up 21-3 if played a million more times. If not for some spectacular plays by the secondary, the Colts would have gotten a big lead early. Make no mistake, Peyton was on target for most of the day, he just didn't convert it into points until the 2nd half.
  3. upstater1

    upstater1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    13,027
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +43 / 4 / -3

    None?

    Well, the last time we played in the RCA dome, the Patriots went up by a similar score, and almost blew the game in the same way. The only difference is we had a healthy defense on the field at the end.
  4. chunkypony

    chunkypony Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,113
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I couldnt agree more. I think that was the 1 in 10 chance that the pats would win that game. And they still didnt win. The play of Hobbs and Samuel early on, as well as the run defense in the first half were the keys, and the run defense needed to continue to be stout. When that did not happen, in combination with other things, lead to the demise of the team last night.
  5. Snarf

    Snarf Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    Messages:
    783
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -1

    Peyton's frickin good.

    Pats were simply outplayed.

    They could have won if the luck had broken on their side, but... it didnt.
  6. MoLewisrocks

    MoLewisrocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    19,949
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +29 / 0 / -0

    The thing you miss is THIS TEAM never played in the RCA Dome before. That was another team and overall a better built team than the one we ultimately fielded this now past season.
  7. richpats

    richpats Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2005
    Messages:
    3,499
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Ironic the reversal in score from that game. I knew even when up 21-3, the Colts would rally. The Pats were fortunate to even be up that much. I believe a closer game would have favored the Pats, though. The offense and defense would have been a little more focused rather than trying to sit on an 18 point lead.
  8. pao

    pao Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2007
    Messages:
    847
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    Honest question, no trolling. Ask the same question about the Charger game the week before. It would be interesting to hear your answers.

    pao
  9. WestPat

    WestPat Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Messages:
    162
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I would say NE wins 5/10, because the lack of experience from the chargers squad will always be there...oh yeah and Marty and his dumb decisions.
  10. upstater1

    upstater1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    13,027
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +43 / 4 / -3

    It all depends on whether the coaches have knowledge from the previous game. If not, then I expect the Patriots to do well.

    Also, we could adjust from that offensive formation we came out of.
  11. pkb

    pkb Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2005
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I think the Pats beat Indy 6 times out of ten on a neutral field. I know what happened this year both times, and I simply don't see that it is likely to occur often. The Pats had a significant deficit in terms of health both games, and they had awful officiating in the first game. Even with those, they were in each game down to the last second. Anyway, that's how I'd describe it.

    I think the Chargers beat the Pats 6-7 of 10 on a neutral field, by the way, so it's not just a question of the Pats being better than everyone in my mind.
  12. teamplay

    teamplay Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    160
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    That would be cheating ;) -- no, the rules are everything is exactly the same right up to the opening kickoff. What, you never saw Groundhog Day? ;)

    And I agree about the Pats winning 6-7 out of 10 against SD. That was an immature team that made some bonehead plays. They'll learn in time...or not!
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2007
  13. jczxohn1

    jczxohn1 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    1,719
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    The thing about this game to me was it just reminded me too much of the regular season game we played and lost. Too many weapons, not enough answers on defense or offense. Hopefully the FO recognizes these defiencies and address them this off-season.
  14. ColtsFan4Life

    ColtsFan4Life Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2005
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I guess you didn't see the coors light commercial when Ditka said living in the past is for cowards.
  15. RayClay

    RayClay On the Roster

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    18,029
    Likes Received:
    186
    Ratings:
    +428 / 5 / -6

    #75 Jersey

    Considering he's been living off 1985 for 20 years, that is hysterical!!!:eek:

    Who writes your material?
  16. RayClay

    RayClay On the Roster

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    18,029
    Likes Received:
    186
    Ratings:
    +428 / 5 / -6

    #75 Jersey

    If the game was played nine more times, Bruschi and Vrabel would be dead.
  17. shakadave

    shakadave Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Messages:
    2,232
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Good question. I think we beat the Colts 3-4 out of 10. Beat the Chargers 4-5 out of 10.

    What I wanna know is, howcome the Colts scored 38 against us, but scored like 17 or 20 against some crappier teams. We weren't perfect, but the #2 defense in points allowed can't be THAT bad!

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>